PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[oakiecokie]

No name attached, “BBC Sport arses”

amended.

 

[Sef]

We only have the information published in Der Spiegel to go on, but the charges identified allege that:

Says it ALL doesnt it??

 

[MCC]

Just a thank you to @projectriver for all of his efforts. Amazing. He's had Nick Harris and Simon Jordan on toast via podcasts and national radio the past couple of months!

 

[citizen_maine]

In the process of a title run in. There’s a fucking surprise.

Yep, that's us derailed. Make no mistake.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

What's it about and why is it only sent via pm?

Something to do with Gail Platt. Once youve seen it, you’ll understand why it can only be sent via PM.

 

[r.soleofsalford]

Yep, that's us derailed. Make no mistake.

More likely it to try and reduce or belittle our achievements than it putting us off

 

[Toney’s bookie]

Manchester City charges explained: What is latest on club's 115 breaches?​

You’d have thought there should be an ‘alleged’ in there somewhere.

In fact, we don’t have any confirmed breaches at all yet - just charges of suspected breaches which are yet to be independently established?

 

[citizen_maine]

More likely it to try and reduce or belittle our achievements than it putting us off

It's not going to do either though is it?

 

[Blue Llama]

Anyone else seen this? It's shocking journalism from the BBC (surprise, surprise) and there are material inaccuracies in it.

Man City 115 charges hearing Q&A: What is latest on PSR & FFP case?

Manchester City's hearing into 115 Premier League charges should be heard this season - BBC Sport looks at the latest on the case.

www.bbc.co.uk

Obviously a response to the gagging order. Basically you cannot shut us up if it's made to look like a statement of facts. Just hope that they have made an error that City's lawyers can nail them with. Or take a leaf out of Ferguson's rule book and ban them sighting the obvious attack within the statement.

 

[jim tolmies perm]

You’d have thought there should be an ‘alleged’ in there somewhere.

In fact, we don’t have any confirmed breaches at all yet - just charges of suspected breaches which are yet to be independently established?

They should be informed immediately...