PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Prestwich_Blue said:
Anyone else seen this? It's shocking journalism from the BBC (surprise, surprise) and there are material inaccuracies in it.

www.bbc.co.uk

Man City 115 charges hearing Q&A: What is latest on PSR & FFP case?

Manchester City's hearing into 115 Premier League charges should be heard this season - BBC Sport looks at the latest on the case.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...

Honestly don't know where to start with this.
Little wonder that whoever wrote this rubbish won't put their name to it.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Anyone else seen this? It's shocking journalism from the BBC (surprise, surprise) and there are material inaccuracies in it.

www.bbc.co.uk

Man City 115 charges hearing Q&A: What is latest on PSR & FFP case?

Manchester City's hearing into 115 Premier League charges should be heard this season - BBC Sport looks at the latest on the case.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
Obviously a response to the gagging order. Basically you cannot shut us up if it's made to look like a statement of facts. Just hope that they have made an error that City's lawyers can nail them with. Or take a leaf out of Ferguson's rule book and ban them sighting the obvious attack within the statement.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Anyone else seen this? It's shocking journalism from the BBC (surprise, surprise) and there are material inaccuracies in it.

www.bbc.co.uk

Man City 115 charges hearing Q&A: What is latest on PSR & FFP case?

Manchester City's hearing into 115 Premier League charges should be heard this season - BBC Sport looks at the latest on the case.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
Q7ozWVYCR0nyW2rvPW.gif

That is absolutely hilarious.
I can imagine whoever wrote it was frothing at the mouth, snot dangling from each nostril and rocking back and forth.

Can't stop laughing. That piece sounds like they know we're getting nothing put on us at all, it's almost like the media saying a player were about to unveil is off to another club.

26gslTGBb2FLlwlNu.gif

Man City, boiling piss since 2008.
 
Blue Llama said:
Obviously a response to the gagging order. Basically you cannot shut us up if it's made to look like a statement of facts. Just hope that they have made an error that City's lawyers can nail them with. Or take a leaf out of Ferguson's rule book and ban them sighting the obvious attack within the statement.
Click to expand...
Should have been banned years ago. God knows why we still entertain questions from Slimy Stone who Im sure will be off with the Rags again on their pre season tour.
That ”article“ is pathetic. Just assumes we are guilty and when not if we face sanctions.
This should be the straw that the club says enough is enough and bans the Rag corporation from the ground.
As others have said, hope our lawyers go through what they have printed as it reads to me they are saying we are guilty.

Rags embarrassed so lets deflect and run yet another story about the 115, well 116 now with Jack fined for speeding which the BBC also thinks is worthy news to be on the sport pages,
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top