No, it's all about unicorns and extra cocks!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
We will have won the Premier League 64 times by then.Or as someone put it earlier, it took them six months to punish Everton and Forest, with one charge each. It should take them 57 years to investigate our 115.
Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
Ha ha, I didn’t spot that! Must have been subliminal!A gander at a sickswan
I think you're getting your ornithology mixed up.
metalblue
Well-Known Member
According to social media not only will the day we are cleared of the major charges be a good day for us, but some of the moaniest glory hunting yank Arsenal and Liverpool fans are gonna give up watching football for good. Win fucking win.
It won’t matter to most of the mouth breathers that occupy social media. We’re guilty as far as they are concerned and we’d have only bribed folk to not find us so.
They walk amongst us.
Next time you see them, be sure to tell them that they're cunts, with compliments from Bluemoon!My scandi friends just regard him as a mercenary who is just passing through until one of the big two in Spain can afford him
bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 24,732
- Team supported
- City
An awful lot is, my own personal opinion thus it means fuck all, is that they can't afford not to find us guilty of somethingIsn't the whole 5000 page thread about 'ifs'?
As long as it’s only 35 charges for non cooperation we’ll be okAn awful lot is, my own personal opinion thus it means fuck all, is that they can't afford not to find us guilty of something
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,981
It’s not whataboutery to ask why one historic accusation is investigated and another isn’t.
If the PL had opened an investigation and decided it just didn’t reach the level of a rules breach then fair enough.
But IIRC the reported reason for not even investigating was the timeline which obviously opens up a question of double standards when they subsequently open an investigation and charge us over even older shit.
The PL didn't open an investigation, the FA did. The FA closed their investigation for many reasons, the main two being the age of the event and the settlement.
So there is no double standard with the PL, effectively, except maybe for why they opened an investigation into City but not Liverpool. Who knows? It's not a transparent organisation. I can make a couple of guesses, though.
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Non cooperation is the way to go, we won’t hand over our wallet, despite being outnumbered 9 to 1If the Premier league find us guilty of anything it will make their competition a laughing stock , the most succesful club for over a decade and breaking all records along the way , and it would also instigate legal claims from the red'istree clubs , there will be other clubs claiming financial settlements for missing out on Champs league football the list will be never ending.
If the Premier league want to ruin the reputation of their product then any charge or settlement against us will have a far reaching impact , personally i think Master's and his cohorts are already discussing with our club how they can come out of this with a semblance of order.
eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 8,109
- Team supported
- Manchester city
Just imagine the shit storm if it was City hacking Liverpool 's computers.We won't ask the PL to charge Liverpool, but it is fair to ask why they weren't charged because the charges were old, and why this standard hasn't been applied to us. Regardless of the settlement (which is of no concern to the PL), we can expect to be treated in the same way, or the PL is guilty of unfair discrimination.