PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Only to sanctimonious Simon or Simple as I like to call him. Never has a human being ( apart from J R Mogg ) put so much effort into using works he hopes other people don’t understand. Bless the poor man is completely inebriated by the exuberance of his own verbosity.
Bet you wish you’d put words instead of works, after all that ;-)
 
A follow up for you: why has it been deemed that straight up owner investment - I own this business, I have this money, I will put this money into this business - is somehow worse than everything you mention?
When FFP was first discussed, debt was the main target, and Platini actually mentioned Real Madrid and Barcelona. He also highlighted Man United and the Glazer debt.

Somehow, by the time it was introduced, rather than targeting these clubs it actually benefitted them.

So, to answer your question, It's worse because the clubs who already had power decided it was.
 
Regarding sponsorship, I’ve no idea but inflating deals has been alleged. Not sure the relevance of the value of the Etihad.

The continued allegation of being propped by related sponsors from AD despite the fact that it’s been proved & accepted they are not related. Also Clubs with US backers are sponsored by US companies, again no suspicious allegations are made so why does this myth continue.

Im not digging you out but I just want people to also consider that the most successful club in the richest league in the world are a pretty attractive proposition.
 
Apologies if this has already been covered.

I have worked for the same highly profitable large corporation business in a senior management role for the last 38 years.

Businesses don't make decisions or decide courses of action, Directors and senior managers do.

Exactly who in the PL management structure is driving this?
Somebody right at the top and previously vetted by the American owners of two clubs not too far from us. That’s who
 
When FFP was first discussed, debt was the main target, and Platini actually mentioned Real Madrid and Barcelona. He also highlighted Man United and the Glazer debt.

Somehow, by the time it was introduced, rather than targeting these clubs it actually benefitted them.

So, to answer your question, It's worse because the clubs who already had power decided it was.

Precisely my point mate. It's a load of old bollocks.
 
I think City desperately need to try and go on a PR offensive. The charges are complex enough but the narrative is simply City cheated therefore relegate them, strip them of titles, deduct points and give them a transfer ban.

As long as that’s the pervading narrative our name is mud. It will damage us in negotiations with players, sponsors and coaches. It will tarnish any of the clubs achievements. If the charges, or the majority and most serious of them, are dismissed that will be a footnote. The damage will have been done. Our club will have suffered such reputational damage that couldn’t be undone.

The City PR department need to do something that never seem to have done before, get very aggressive. We could warn journalists to temper their articles, tell them if they condemn us now, we’ll ban them for life if the charges are dismissed. Warn newspapers, Sky, Talksport to be accurate and neutral or lose all access if we’re cleared. It might stop the condemnation and move towards factual reporting.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.