shit **** ?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Bluewonder
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 3,280
The key fact (deliberately) omitted from this tweet is that there was no involvement of the UAE Government.
It was just the UK Govt talking to another branch of the UK Govt.
Disingenuous dickheads.
Hope this works as I am still learning how to use archive.ph
An excellent read, thanks for sharing.
Of course they’ve discussed it.
‘You know them billions of pounds we were expecting to be invested in the uk, well we might not be getting a single penny cos City have wiped the floor with red cartel’
With regards the cease and desist letters, it's possible that they were sent out, but the recipients have perhaps chosen to ignore them following legal advice. I am no lawyer, but whilst there has been a press bonanza designed to satisfy the baying mob, City have done the treble and now possibly the double. Fingers crossed on the latter. Therefore, have City suffered financial loss because of the garbage reporting, E.g
Lost key sponsors etc. Possibly Not. Additionally, the recipients of the letters may have weighed up how much money they can earn from the usual click bait and compared this with the financial risks e.g. compensation, legal costs etc. Maybe they have taken a gamble based on a risk assessment of the potential costs. I have seen cease and desist orders when working in industry and one of the options is to ignore them which we did on occasion. Tolmie's Hairdoo may have been right, but the recipients may have decided to ignore them or moderate their behaviour only marginally. If they did go out, it will have been to the big hitters and that does not mean the Nottingham Forest WUM. Just a thought.
Lost key sponsors etc. Possibly Not. Additionally, the recipients of the letters may have weighed up how much money they can earn from the usual click bait and compared this with the financial risks e.g. compensation, legal costs etc. Maybe they have taken a gamble based on a risk assessment of the potential costs. I have seen cease and desist orders when working in industry and one of the options is to ignore them which we did on occasion. Tolmie's Hairdoo may have been right, but the recipients may have decided to ignore them or moderate their behaviour only marginally. If they did go out, it will have been to the big hitters and that does not mean the Nottingham Forest WUM. Just a thought.
I'm no cynic but...
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 3,973
- Location
- True friends stab you in the front.
- Team supported
- The one and only City
And we are still awaiting the results of the 115 charges for that.On the day that Man City win their 4th title in a row, an independent panel of experts has found Ethihad Airlines and middle-eastern people in general responsible for the exctinction inducing asteroid that killed off the dinosaurs 66 million years ago.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
4 guilty faces -:)
Ducado
Well-Known Member
It won’t stop them talking about it, it’s in the public domain,With regards the cease and desist letters, it's possible that they were sent out, but the recipients have perhaps chosen to ignore them following legal advice. I am no lawyer, but whilst there has been a press bonanza designed to satisfy the baying mob, City have done the treble and now possibly the double. Fingers crossed on the latter. Therefore, have City suffered financial loss because of the garbage reporting, E.g
Lost key sponsors etc. Possibly Not. Additionally, the recipients of the letters may have weighed up how much money they can earn from the usual click bait and compared this with the financial risks e.g. compensation, legal costs etc. Maybe they have taken a gamble based on a risk assessment of the potential costs. I have seen cease and desist orders when working in industry and one of the options is to ignore them which we did on occasion. Tolmie's Hairdoo may have been right, but the recipients may have decided to ignore them or moderate their behaviour only marginally. If they did go out, it will have been to the big hitters and that does not mean the Nottingham Forest WUM. Just a thought.
hihosilva
Well-Known Member
4 guilty faces -:)
Wow Khaldoon has lost some weight
Yes he just loaned to txiki with an option to buy plus add on bonus.Wow Khaldoon has lost some weight