PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

This is pure stalking/fatal attraction/bunny boiling shite from Nick Harris. Wow. What an absolute fuckin clown doing what he's done.

Let this be a lesson to parents doubtful about their kids doing social media. Don't let them as it is full of weird shit and weird fuckers with obvious personality disorders.

Wow. Really messed up shite this.
 
mancity2012_eamo said:
We were found not guilty in a proper court and without new evidence I fully expect us to be found not guilty again.

If the PL processes are fair and equitable, that is how it should be, I believe.
Click to expand...
While the logic sounds good, it potentially falls apart IF the charges are not exactly the same, and brought by a different body operating under different rules.

Of course. IF the charges and rules were the same, one would reasonably expect the same legal outcome. However, they’re not only not the same, but are being heard by a different “court” under different “laws.”

Therein lies jeopardy…even if I agree that we have done nothing wrong, which I’m not sure ANY OF US are in a position to actually know.

This is why you hire the best lawyers for the charges leveled, as opposed to creating 5700+ pages of internet conjecture as evidence of being squeaky clean!

Fingers crossed this all goes away LEGALLY, but we all know the damage done to City’s reputation isn’t going away anytime soon, if ever, regardless of the outcome. The “history” of the last decade plus has been written by tribal foes and no amount of legal victories are going to change that for those tribes!
 
Last edited:
Gorton_Tubster said:
Santi's magic hat. Santi corzola, it’s a thing with Arsenal fans. Date of creation was April12th or something which coincided with an instragram or threads account created on the same date with the same sort of name, cant remember, I even checked the profile icon but not used anywhere else except available on Shutterstock, then I got bored because at the end of the day its an Arse fan who is very bitter at losing.
Click to expand...
Good point and may just be a coincidence with my Saints observation.

But an account set up focusing solely on 115 appealing to bitter Arsenal fans - yet hardly following any Arsenal accounts ?? Then renaming a few weeks later after getting traction on multiple posts based on info doing the rounds for years ?

Could be some random I suppose but does seem weird the whole set up.
 
Prophet of Doom said:
Good point and may just be a coincidence with my Saints observation.

But an account set up focusing solely on 115 appealing to bitter Arsenal fans - yet hardly following any Arsenal accounts ?? Then renaming a few weeks later after getting traction on multiple posts based on info doing the rounds for years ?

Could be some random I suppose but does seem weird the whole set up.
Click to expand...

Someone who can write in a structured way with estimated reading times, if what this person outlines is so earth shattering why don’t they want to put their actual name on it and why would you put it out for free if you could monetise it?
 
Invisible Man's Bandage said:
Just to finish off trying to point out the agenda based bias throughout Magic Twat's thread:

His view is that being found guilty of the non co-operation claims only (I don't consider them to be charges) should result in the club being relegated.

It's just the usual bollocks dressed up in legal language but loads of it to give it 'gravitas'.
Click to expand...

The other day on X, @projectriver was drawn into a debate with this Manic Twat character in which the latter was pursuing a bullshit argument about the CAS panel having a conflict of interest. Stefan suggested that the guy was neither an English nor a Swiss lawyer and lacked sufficient experience to assess the issue properly.

Based on the guy's X posts, I agree, as, to judge from what I've seen, he lacks the analytical skills I'd expect from even a lawyer of well below average ability. That said, I haven't yet managed to hold my nose and wade through his latest tirade of sesquipedalian intellectual dishonesty.

Today was a working day for me. I may give it a quick scan in the morning, though I'm fucked if I'm devoting 90 minutes to some dreary screed composed in the utmost bad faith.
 
Last edited:
The only reason I saw the Magic Hat thread was when I noticed it on @projectriver X account. He seemed to give it a kind of 'well done' but obviously biased response. My question to him now would be what does he think of it after maybe fully reading it? Statements such as we will be 'crushed' and are 'totally fucked' are really unprofessional and clearly showing the real message behind the veneer of legalistic bluster.

Could it be Nick Harris in your view?
 
Invisible Man's Bandage said:
The only reason I saw the Magic Hat thread was when I noticed it on @projectriver X account. He seemed to give it a kind of 'well done' but obviously biased response. My question to him now would be what does he think of it after maybe fully reading it? Statements such as we will be 'crushed' and are 'totally fucked' are really unprofessional and clearly showing the real message behind the veneer of legalistic bluster.

Could it be Nick Harris in your view?
Click to expand...
The guy has put a lot of work in. I got asked about it and I don't want any lack of response to be a suggestion it has lots of great points.

I think he genuinely does believe City are fcked. But so what? I read enough to know a lot of it was sound reading of the emails presented - much of that reading wouldn't be disputed by City. The emails say what the emails say. But I am not spending the time going through 25 long posts and responding line by line. The fundamental misunderstanding is how these trials work, the documents that will likely be available (lots), the importance of witness evidence, the submissions of the defence barristers etc.

It is not Nick Harris. Most likely a young American lawyer or law student.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.