Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Not sure what you mean? Stefan says this happens all the time. If you mean how it is perceived then yes I agree with you.Come on your not that naive.
Not sure what you mean? Stefan says this happens all the time. If you mean how it is perceived then yes I agree with you.Come on your not that naive.
The Grauniad still use that settlement as proof we cheated.When City settled with UEFA in private, City were guilty in public. City thought the case was closed.
When UEFA wanted to open the case again, City said fuck off, we'll see you at CAS. City won the case.
The Grauniad still use that settlement as proof we cheated.
But Stefan‘s examples are unlikely to have had the public profile of this. Questions have been asked in the House.Not sure what you mean? Stefan says this happens all the time. If you mean how it is perceived then yes I agree with you.
I understand your point and it would be perceived like that. I’m just saying that City could, in theory, accept a substantial punishment without any admission of guilt whatsoever.Not if it’s the biggest deduction in the history of English football. A minor fine, ok, but for 20 points we would have to accept guilt for something.
shit like this really fucks me off.
Not part of England but the capital of the Independent People’s Democratic Republic of Mardarse.(Currency: The Hubcap. 10 to the dollar.)What? But? Wait? How?
You mean that ex mardarse manager of the mardarse club was being a mardarse in front of a hundreds of mardarses who all hail from the capital city of mardarses that is Liverpool?
Well I fuckin never.
He’d rather be idolised by the Scouse mob for all he would have won had City not cheated!If Klopp had any class he would have STFU given what Pep said about him the other day.
shit like this really fucks me off.
The fact that account gets so worked up that he's being called Nick Harris is confirmation enough it's Nick for me.lolIF it is him as both, just imagine how much of a psycho he is.