PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

give it to gordon said:
I agree City are called guilty or implied guilty on a daily basis. I do wonder how City will get a fair hearing.
I know people says it's KC and they won't let this effect them but still part of me thinks it will.
Plus I don't see how it's legal for the press/media to call us guilty
Click to expand...
It is a civil dispute so no rules like criminal proceedings.
 
KS55 said:
In my experience they then asked for documentation, ie an audit trail. When I was responsible for a main budget in a large company, every year they asked me to prove a selection of items with full documentation. In addition if any items were queried, I would be questioned as well. They could not be fobbed off but, equally, they were not finickety to the last degree.
Click to expand...

Maybe not to start with, but if multiple regulatory bodies began investigating they would surely make enquiries until satisfied everything was legit? If they weren't satisfied and believed there was even the remotest possibility they had been misled, they would surely have resigned.
 
Coatigan said:
I get that. I have welcomed it, certaunly found it both interesting and informative.

Don't think you have understood what I was trying to say, but I'll leave it, it is jot that important.

I think too many people say things way too freely with this. But I guess with nothing there to discourage it, it is inevitable.
Click to expand...
It makes money for the media.

They can have opinions of the news presented as news, deliberate lies presented as news etc..

If both sides prefer to ignore it why should we worry.? All we do is add to the revenue created.

In the past so called D Notices were put on some Gov news and for legal cases once arrest happens it seems media speculation is banned until a court verdict arrives.
 
halfcenturyup said:
View attachment 120962
They are in separate paragraphs, unless I am missing something
Click to expand...
The relevant clause is quite clear. A member club to include full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with the manager. Surely that means any other contracts are nothing to do with us and as long as the club has paid what's in that contract and nothing more, then there is no issue, even if the club was aware that he had another contract with someone else. Having 2 jobs is not a crime and it does not breach Premier League rules. Same applies to player contracts. The key is the word it's. That implies other contracts are irrelevant does it not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.