PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

There doesn’t seem to be the same anger at city challenging a rule compared to Chelsea using loop holes of selling hotels to get round psr now it’s been ratified by the Premier League. Could you imagine the outpouring of rage if City had tried that.
Chelsea are shit though so they don't care.
 
Wonder if his bosses in America know he's alienating a large number of customers?
When you consider the crap these big US food chains market at scandolous prices then It makes me wonder why anyone eats at KFC, Dominoes, Macs, or drinks the over priced coffee at Starbucks etc, and thats before any of them slag City off.
 
There doesn’t seem to be the same anger at city challenging a rule compared to Chelsea using loop holes of selling hotels to get round psr now it’s been ratified by the Premier League. Could you imagine the outpouring of rage if City had tried that.
Chelsea aren't winning trophies that they believe are rightfully theirs
 
There doesn’t seem to be the same anger at city challenging a rule compared to Chelsea using loop holes of selling hotels to get round psr now it’s been ratified by the Premier League. Could you imagine the outpouring of rage if City had tried that.

Could you imagine the outpouring of rage if our most prominant sponsor was allegedly laundering money for terrorists?
 
Could you imagine the outpouring of rage if our most prominant sponsor was allegedly laundering money for terrorists?
Or a tax dodging scruffy **** avoiding paying his way to the British economy , who then wants the British tax payer to fund “the Wembley of the north?” No stone would be unturned if that was City. But it’s United isn’t it ? And Liverpool who have airbrushed the shit they caused for clubs qualifying to play in European competitions for three seasons.
 
On one of the Matt Lawton links I made a comment that City are only raising some legal issues, have no intention of wanting to rule the world, and regardless of outcome, the process will have nothing to do with the 115 charges.

I got twitter notifications of 15 responses, but within an hour the number had reduced to 9.

Not sure of the exact reasoning, but I'm guessing that fans of other clubs wishing me a violent death are frowned upon by the Twitter censors.

I just hope that a more vulnerable City supporter (or indeed fans of any club) don't receive similar vitriol.

Otherwise the Times might have blood on their hands.
 
On one of the Matt Lawton links I made a comment that City are only raising some legal issues, have no intention of wanting to rule the world, and regardless of outcome, the process will have nothing to do with the 115 charges.

I got twitter notifications of 15 responses, but within an hour the number had reduced to 9.

Not sure of the exact reasoning, but I'm guessing that fans of other clubs wishing me a violent death are frowned upon by the Twitter censors.

I just hope that a more vulnerable City supporter (or indeed fans of any club) don't receive similar vitriol.

Otherwise the Times might have blood on their hands.

Not sure that they would actually give a fuck !

Media whores of the lowest ranking.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.