PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Did they? Is there proof of that, I mean what makes you think that? I wasnt watching.

It just seems a lot of people at our rival clubs are leaving their roles.
I heard the middle east link to the United plans soon after it was announced from a business contact. The Ratcliffe stance is clear because he knows Khaldoon and he has recruited some of our senior staff. Notably Berrada. Ratcliffe has publically supported City on the 115 case allegations. He must have done due diligence on Berrada before taking him on. The media have stopped running stories which have obviously come from David Gill via Tariq Panja. Ratcliffe has also put Ferguson back in his box. The main drivers of the hate since then (and probably before) have been Levy and Lewis and they have both gone for whatever reasons. Liverpool have also calmed down since Klopp left.
 
OJ Simpson: “Trial of the Century”. Arrested June 1994, verdict October 1995. We are going on 3 years. This is fucning ridiculous. At this point I really don’t give a shit anymore.
 
I heard the middle east link to the United plans soon after it was announced from a business contact. The Ratcliffe stance is clear because he knows Khaldoon and he has recruited some of our senior staff. Notably Berrada. Ratcliffe has publically supported City on the 115 case allegations. He must have done due diligence on Berrada before taking him on. The media have stopped running stories which have obviously come from David Gill via Tariq Panja. Ratcliffe has also put Ferguson back in his box. The main drivers of the hate since then (and probably before) have been Levy and Lewis and they have both gone for whatever reasons. Liverpool have also calmed down since Klopp left.
haha nice one. Makes sense.
 
I think it all started to change when Omar Berrada took over as CEO.
The rag hierarchy must be convinced of City's innocence, or they'd never have employed Berrada, it'd be like employing a walking time bomb.
Which also ties in with scruffy Jim declaring City innocent and the rags keeping in with the Arabs.

Scruffy Jim declared City innocent?

Is he on the panel, or just ITK
 
I think it all started to change when Omar Berrada took over as CEO.
The rag hierarchy must be convinced of City's innocence, or they'd never have employed Berrada, it'd be like employing a walking time bomb.
Which also ties in with scruffy Jim declaring City innocent and the rags keeping in with the Arabs.
No, it definitely changed almost straight away when Scruffy Jim bought in. Has Berrada ever been quoted on anything to do with us?
 
OJ Simpson: “Trial of the Century”. Arrested June 1994, verdict October 1995. We are going on 3 years. This is fucning ridiculous. At this point I really don’t give a shit anymore.

It's the fact it's not the actual hearing but the decision/verdict which is taking an age I find ridiculous. The heating lasted 12 weeks but finished back in January IIRC. To then be taking upwards of 10 months to make a decision and publish it in some shape or form is insane.

I've seen fraud trials etc which last 4 or 5 years and I get that when it's the actual trial. The wait for the verdict is another matter altogether and it's hard to comprehend why or how they can take so long over this.
 
I heard the middle east link to the United plans soon after it was announced from a business contact. The Ratcliffe stance is clear because he knows Khaldoon and he has recruited some of our senior staff. Notably Berrada. Ratcliffe has publically supported City on the 115 case allegations. He must have done due diligence on Berrada before taking him on. The media have stopped running stories which have obviously come from David Gill via Tariq Panja. Ratcliffe has also put Ferguson back in his box. The main drivers of the hate since then (and probably before) have been Levy and Lewis and they have both gone for whatever reasons. Liverpool have also calmed down since Klopp left.
You have raised some great points there, plus they seem quite logical after reading them.
 
You have raised some great points there, plus they seem quite logical after reading them.
It is just a pure guess but I wouldn't be surprised if Khaldoon and Sheikh Mansour were happy with United's proposals. Sheikh Mansour has made enormous profits on his investments in Manchester. The more successful Manchester is the richer he will become. Inward investment in Trafford can only boost the ongoing development of the city region. I also don't believe Burnham and Ratcliffe would have both been so public with their comments unless they had an investor lined up. Burnham has been adamant that no public money will be used. It would be career suicide for him if he was lying about that.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top