mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
I’m fully aware of that, but the principle of disclosure cannot be much different.It’s not a criminal trial.
I’m fully aware of that, but the principle of disclosure cannot be much different.It’s not a criminal trial.
also lack thereof would be damning also, we got done on the strength of 6 emails out of hundreds of thousands so even if the pl execs supply emails and txts it would be a statistical improbability to say that none of them allude to at least some level of collusion to stop city so they are damned if they and damned if they dont.
We didn’t, but explain that to the media and cartel fanzines.Tell us, when did we ‘get off on a technicality’?
Going back a few years the papers showed a picture of the red shirt owners all having a meal together, Spurs owner present as well I think. I bet your bottom dollar the scheming was starting then, the jealous bastards
You mean, we get off on a technicality again?
Still guilty in the media?
Hard to see that being acceptable.
Just the Red Shirts, Spurs didn't get invited.Going back a few years the papers showed a picture of the red shirt owners all having a meal together, Spurs owner present as well I think. I bet your bottom dollar the scheming was starting then, the jealous bastards
Levy was the waiter :)Just the Red Shirts, Spurs didn't get invited.
sortedLevy was eating scraps off plates :)