I will ask again, someone posted the section from the CAS findings re the time barred and the fact that it did not matter as the "charges" that were time barred were not valid, can someone post it again? I want to use it to shoot a know all Utd fan down (he never ever thinks he is wrong). Thanks all
Think this gentleman has got what your after
It's on page 25 but it's part of our submission to CAS. However in that, it says that UEFA's Adjudicatory Chamber found that everything was OK with the Etisalat sponsorship and that Etisalat had fully met its obligations (see para 20)