PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Rag wanker said: "Last night it was announced that Manchester City's hearing will start in four weeks. I wonder if they're not signing anybody on purpose, thinking they might get the book thrown at them.

"If they think they're going to get found guilty, and something ridiculous happens, they get relegated or deducted 20 points, they might think what is the point of signing players now. They got £82million for Alvarez, and they might just see what happens."

So that’s it lads, pack up. The red cunts have somehow found the evidence that dosent exist to punish the club even before the tribunal has started.

Take a bow Rato. Mastermind has spoken.

Live on sly sports:

Imagine how far that £82m will go in the Northern Premier League, though.
 
Gary Neville questioned the reason behind Manchester City's quiet summer transfer window (Image: YouTube)
Gary Neville questioned whether Manchester City's impending hearing into their 115 alleged breaches of Premier League rules is behind their uneventful transfer window. Pep Guardiola's side have made just one signing this summer on the back of their record fourth Premier League triumph, with Brazilian winger Savinho arriving in a £21million deal from Ligue 1 side Troyes.
Despite the departures of Sergio Gomez and Julian Alvarez, with the latter leaving Manchester in a £82m deal to join Atletico Madrid, City have yet to replace the Argentine who scored 19 goals in 54 games for the club last season and proved to play a vital role alongside Erling Haaland.


https://localplan.co/article/SIN-1350


Goodfellas Laughing GIFs | GIFDB.com

Every discussion about it is all about if we are guilty then they go on about what could happen to us! Not one person in the media say what if all this isn't true and certain clubs, those clubs who signed that letter to get the accounts looked at had an agenda because of the owner the money Pep the manager!? Just pure jealousy!
 
The Premier League rules are made up because they let the scum red tops do whatever they want. Once they have had enough of City they can do and say whatever they like,

In the PSR court case, Clearly City won because Masters came out and said it does not work for the scum red tops or other teams in the League, So what happens now is the scum red tops will get away with anything they want and be allowed to spend £Billions and put in into the club debts.

Mark my words here, Once they get rid of City with the 115 charges United will be winning titles again.
After this new rule change and Manchester City is out of the way and in an impossible situation of championship football and a with transfer window embargo its over for at least 5 years.

The Premier League rules are made up because they let the scum red tops do whatever they want. Once they have had enough of City they can do and say whatever they like,

In the PSR court case, Clearly City won because Masters came out and said it does not work for the scum red tops or other teams in the League, So what happens now is the scum red tops will get away with anything they want and be allowed to spend £Billions and put in into the club debts.

Mark my words here, Once they get rid of City with the 115 charges United will be winning titles again.
After this new rule change and Manchester City is out of the way and in an impossible situation of championship football and a with transfer window embargo its over for at least 5 years.
Trust in Khaldoon mate.
 
Honestly the whole Dominos Vs City arc is confusing and not interesting at all. At least with paddy power they have the grace of being an entity of the football world. Dominos? Not so much…

They should stick to pizza instead of trying to get involved for social media cred.

Paddy Power rip the piss out of everybody equally to be fair to them. Dominos is just fucking weird
 
If anything he distanced himself from any future outcomes.
He is supposed to be distant from the process.

If all he knows is the way how both sides presented their evidence before the Panel discusses the legal detail then it's as much as our team know but if he knows more it is being leaked.
 
He is supposed to be distant from the process.

If all he knows is the way how both sides presented their evidence before the Panel discusses the legal detail then it's as much as our team know but if he knows more it is being leaked.

As the prosecuting KC is acting on their behalf then he will have feedback from them but nothing from the arbitrator is my understanding.
 
That’s the biggest load of shit I’ve seen in this thread and that takes some doing. We won’t be relegated for non cooperation.
Non-cooperation is just a catch all to help them recover costs. You didn’t do EXACTLY what we asked. It’s bollux.
 
Even in the event of City being 'guilty" of some of this, I doubt the arbitration would be enough for clubs to use as eviidence and I'd imagine a court would have to consider their claim from scratch.
Arbitration could be as dodgy as hell.
Be interested if others agree it would be a fresh claim..
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.