PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Rag wanker said: "Last night it was announced that Manchester City's hearing will start in four weeks. I wonder if they're not signing anybody on purpose, thinking they might get the book thrown at them.

"If they think they're going to get found guilty, and something ridiculous happens, they get relegated or deducted 20 points, they might think what is the point of signing players now. They got £82million for Alvarez, and they might just see what happens."

So that’s it lads, pack up. The red cunts have somehow found the evidence that dosent exist to punish the club even before the tribunal has started.

Take a bow Rato. Mastermind has spoken.

Live on sly sports:
 
The €30 million non-cooperation fine imposed by UEFA was reduced to €10 million by CAS.

Surely any guilty verdict on non-cooperation imposed by the PL, would not be judged to have given City an on-field advantage, and would therefore attract a fine rather than a points deduction?
We weren't fined £30m by UEFA for non-cooperation. It was a £30m fine for all the charges which CAS reduced to £10m as UEFA didnt specify how much of the fine was for the non-cooperation
 
It's not the Kangaroo we all should be worrying about and the independent panel, it's in our own defence that allowed Uefa to find us not guilty but accept a fine of £10million for not corresponding with them,

Now if the same happens and the panel finds us not guilty of any wrongdoings, BUT they say for not corresponding with them on time your punishment is relegation, We don't have a right to appeal and a guilty verdict in the media is good enough for them to be right and cheats
That’s the biggest load of shit I’ve seen in this thread and that takes some doing. We won’t be relegated for non cooperation.
 
We weren't fined £30m by UEFA for non-cooperation. It was a £30m fine for all the charges which CAS reduced to £10m as UEFA didnt specify how much of the fine was for the non-cooperation
So would it be accurate to say CAS decided (estimated) that the €10 million fine was for non-cooperation?
 
Couldn't agree more.
Let the "banter" merchants dredge up the charges as much as they like because their answer is ready-made. The reality will inevitably be that soon City will have faced CAS, APT hearings plus the 115 case and we will still be standing. Three different cases, yet City are still in a position to thrive. How many more do they want to prove it has all been a game of smoke and mirrors?
You are right though: the smears, as you say, will linger - but, I believe that over time, their importance will dwindle.

We shouldn't forget the Old Cartel have a proprietary sense of the Premier League. Not surprisingly so when we remember it was their blackmailing, arm-twisting, railroading and double-dealing that manifested the competition. The arrival of new money (Chelsea, ourselves, Newcastle inevitably) has already weakened their command of the narrative (not to mention the remuneration) and the seemingly ineluctable appointment of government oversight threatens to remove much of their considerable influence.

I say much of their influence because inevitably they will adapt and evolve. They are astute at playing political shenanigans so I wouldn't dismiss them as a force in the future. What I will say, is they will never wield the same degree of power again. Their frantic efforts at establishing the ESL, Project Big Picture, apparently ilegal PSR rules and the constant harassment of City (and others) might be offered as proof that they know how much power they will lose too. They'll still have a great deal of course but they are desperately fighting to remain untouchable.
The tide of change has already begun to lap around their ankles. City's emergence from these 115 charges will only expose them further.

(Edited because a combination of my fat fingers and ducking autocarrot made it almost illegible)
Autocarrot. I'm having that lol
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.