PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

5. Mancini / Toure - remuneration
The PL have to prove that City did not declare the money paid to Mancini, 1.75 mill per annum, by the Abu Dhabi football club Al Jazeera Sports Cultural Club through Sparkleglow Ltd (a Mancini owned company) arranged by ADUG was part of his City remuneration package. If there are separate employment contracts whose obligations are agreed and met by both parties it is difficult to see how it can be proved by the PL. There also seems some confusion as to if the PL are trying to a) include this remuneration money as part of the charge of "failing to submit accurate fincial information" for those years it was paid up to 2013. Clearly it would appear these annual amounts, if proven to be such as alleged, would likely be insufficient to create a "false financial picture" of the accounts on their own.
Or b) simply imply it was omitted from Mancinis full salary declarations by City which is a breach of a current rule in the PL handbook but unsure if it breaches such a rule, if proven, from 2011- 2013.
Funnily this point about the rules at the time came up on Twitter today

The rule before 21/22 was very different
 
Or,
That Hitler bloke was a gas man, give him his due!

Cromwell? Centuries on, is still a bad word, a curse in Ireland.

Seriously?

A well-respected Polish Jewish scientist, experienced broadcaster, poet and artist, working on his first ever, and only, trip to Auschwitz, a place to which he had previously decided as a matter of principle he would never go, without a script and talking personally and without vindictiveness about the stark difference between science and the scientific method and the causes of the holocaust which took the lives of many of his family, whilst walking ankle-deep into a pond which, as he said, probably contained the ashes of those relatives?

The bastard.
 
An interesting and informative read. Judging by the language and terminology used, you appear to have some expertise and experience of legal matters as they apply to large organisations and contractual issues in particular. While I'm not challenging your word, it would be helpful to know whether indeed that is the case if only to help reinforce the measured optimism throughout your comment with an assurance that you speak with some authority on such matters.
Yes to the former although i am not a legal advocate or solicitor.
My optimism comes from affirmations of my opinion from Stefan Borson, who is a legal professional and his comments on talksport, podcasts and his substack. (See below)
 
Yes to the former although i am not a legal advocate or solicitor.
My optimism comes from affirmations of my opinion from Stefan Borson, who is a legal professional and his comments on talksport, podcasts and his substack. (See below)

Naah. The guy works for City, is involved in the fraud and so can't be trusted. I know because I saw it on Twitter.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.