PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

abu13 said:
I think that Everton also tried to claim for loss of Sponsorship following the Russian invasion of Ukraine but were declined something along the lines of due dilligance and should have factored in any failure in completing the full sponsorship.

Funnily enough another club were able to take up sponsorship from Chevrolet who had zero UK presence and then went on to quickly sack the person responsible for signing off on the deal, they then subsequently signed a deal with Team Viewer worth over 50% of their company revenue where nobody could understand how they were going to meet the obligations which they ultimately failed to do. And now they have a new £60 million deal with Snap Dragon who I believe don't sell direct to the consumer and who's target market are the Microsoft's and Samsung's of this world. Hard to see how the deal gets justifies their investment.

Strange really, no questions asked.
Click to expand...
To be fair someone being daft enough to sponsor United for more than they should doesn’t make it dodgy. I don’t see how it can be what’s the advantage what’s the links / connection.

What are the details of the Everton sponsorship ? Was it pre initial invasion or pre full invasion ? How much ? What where they supposed to do I am not sure anything war like is especially foreseeable or what you normally think about. Are there insurance policies for this ? Why have they Everton not challenged it more ?
 
give it to gordon said:
When a simpleton like me reads a post like this. I just can't understand what the pl are playing at. The pl must have shed loads of shit on these very high profile powerful business people, to be calling them liers.
Click to expand...
It’s mind-boggling. If City were guilty it would involve a conspiracy involving scores of people as well as all these senior directors. What possible evidence can the PL leadership have for these claims. It is just madness.
 
Father Paul said:
Not sure I agree. There would be no direct interference with the Panel but I would think the UK Govt would not want the UAE to be totally pissed off if for example we got a severe penalty resulting in relegation. I am coming around to the conclusion that we may face a 30 or 40 point penalty if the majority of the charges stick. This is not likely to be enough to relegate us but will of course put us out of Europe.
Click to expand...

Any punishment would be proportionate to the volume and seriousness of any breaches.

Nothing else would come into it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CC1
manimanc said:
Not really.
And to be honest the only two things that made me laugh from that was Silvestre saying great it's a better chance for everyone if we get a points deduction and Andy Gray saying the same.
I thought it was a reasonable discussion from 3 pundits discussing the charges.
No biggie.
Click to expand...
No facts though just guilty anyway and we already knew that
 
I read on here that a PL executive had resigned because 'certain clubs had too much influence'; who was that?
 
Centurions said:
It was one of the PL heads they tried to appoint before Masters was "interviewed" by the rags and dippers. The woman from the Discovery TV group I think.
Click to expand...
That was Susannah Dinnage, but apparently she didn't give any reasons for pulling out.
I definitely read that someone had resigned stating the level of influence of certain clubs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.