he works for the rags and dippers so he is doing it for 5 pound an hr and lunch because he supported them when he was little
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Do we know how much an hour the prem league KC is on, seems strange they only mention Pannicks made up fee.
about 150k a week
drthingy
Well-Known Member
We’ll see things they’ll never see.No matter what the outcome nothing can take away the wonderful feelings we felt at the time over the last 15 years.
MUTV probably.Will the hearing be streamed live on the old Dodgy box?
Yes City have said they have proof from the start of their innocence.This is just the beginning. Buckle in for the next few months. Fuck everyone and focus on City, Lord Pannick and his crew.
They’ve got this.
I'm sure Lord Pannick will have it all under control.
malkie
Well-Known Member
Not on my telly they won’t. Binned Sky Sports , Talksport with pictures.Are sky media going to mention this every day by saying "this is day 2 of the 115" then go through the severe punishment we will get and never mention what will happen if we are cleared!
Some feat they achieved, gathering so many incompetents on one channel .
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
YepHa ha so United scum post another record loss..
Oh yeah Quick start the trial against City
Absolute shit show
Don't forget the complimentary quilt cover.he works for the rags and dippers so he is doing it for 5 pound an hr and lunch because he supported them when he was little
Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
But they haven’t floated on the NYSE have they…..unless I missed it. There was a rumour about 6 months that they were going to, but then zilchUnless I have missed it, wasn't all this detail suppose to come out in the public domain with Etihad floating on the New York stock exchange.
Therefore making it more impossible for the prem league to prove because the numbers will be there in black and white.
I think I would prefer the charges not to even be mentioned. If, say, the verdict ends up being on 65 charges, it will highlight that the original rushed announcement was nothing more than a vindictive publicity stunt.The PL are suing City for breach of contract, albeit it is being settled by arbitration. If the PL decline to offer evidence of a particular breach, normally that would be the end of it. The panel would not waste time on an item which was no longer in contention. I suppose City could ask the panel for a formal verdict of not proven.