PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Naive question, but why so many barristers? Do they all have different fields of expertise? Are they each covering different aspects of the case?
 
The mood on here is positive even very confident, even bordering on the euphoric, but a warning that we have to secure the dismissal of these allegations, including the allegation of non-cooperation, as our one and only objective. The club claims tohave evidence which proves beyond any doubt that we have broken no regulations and we have a legal team capable of arguing our case at least as well as any other. But the hearing as only just begun and it is ridiculous to start dreaming of how we can settle scores with the cartel, with the corrupt PL and with the big mouthed Tebas. Believing much of the PL's evidence against us is hacked emails - which prove nothing - we are confident that the emails the PL may have had to release will prove both the existence of the cartel (rather than lobbying of the PL by rival clubs) and the corruption at the hear of the PL. As tall an order as the PL in proving we did what we haven't done. And then there is Tebas, a lawyer who is careful what he says and actually angers us by general statements Pep can agree with. I'll settle for a clear IC statement that we have don nothing wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.