PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Is this the only thing regarding the Etisalat deal which was in the leaked emails? Surely if this has been explained at CAS, this part of the alleged breaches will be knocked off?

The new emails from der Spiegel didn't include any new Etisalat-specific information, although they did include information about sponsorships generally.

But let's not forget, the PL will have seen much more information than der Spiegel leaked, after their four year investigation. They may have some unanswered questions on other years.

But Jaber Mohammed was pretty much explained at CAS.
 
Naive question, but why so many barristers? Do they all have different fields of expertise? Are they each covering different aspects of the case?

They'll have different areas of expertise, but there will be a lead and then a team supporting. It's also about image. It might have served the PL better if they dragged in some peasant in an old wrinkled suit just to make sure the rhetoric about us having the better lawyers was truly cemented.
 
The best one I have heard today is 20 of the 115 charges City has already been found guilty off haha haha

Look I see it as City can not lose because if you think, if we are found guilty we are taking everybody else down with us, The whole system is bent to the core, just look over the road when Utd fudged £75 million in allowances with PSR and others ask for allowance was but was turned down, Utd even said it because of our annual turnover is greater than the rest hahahaah BENT to the core
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.