Plus every director has remained on the board including some with no skin plus unequivocal witness evidence at CAS from all sorts of people
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
More fool you for reading it and more fool you for even commenting on it.There is an article today that City will be expelled from all compeitions when found guilty !
They don't want to relegate us, they just want to bury us alive
The IC would have read the written openings which will refer them to the parties’ key documents and positions. They will be taken through the documents in more detail through the hearing.Would the IC members really see all the evidence from both sides before the hearing, surely that’s the purpose of the hearing. I can imagine the PL legal team telling the PL that on the basis of the evidence it’s what they believe
All pretty unlikely especially before any cross examination which won’t conclude for some time. Right now the best the sides will have is an impression of each ICs members general view. It’s really very very early in a hearing like thisI guess it's possible that the 3-man commission had looked at the evidence and come back with the view that it would be a 10 or even 12-point deduction based on the evidence they'd seen so far. And that to save the huge expense of a 3-month hearing, and probably an appeal, the PL were prepared to settle for less, in order to avoid the expense.
It's also possible that they were told that it was the IC's view that it was only 50/50 that they'd land the main allegations, and they wanted to try to get a result without that uncertainty, and one that satisfied the cartel as well.
It could also be possible that they did this entirely off their own bat, having discussed with the cartel what they'd consider the minimum adequate outcome.
We don't know, and we'll only know when the IC makes its findings known.
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
Was just about to post this. Fucking unbelievable! They want us wiped off the map.destroyed and gone for ever while the scum media in this country cheer them on!There is an article today that City will be expelled from all compeitions when found guilty !
They don't want to relegate us, they just want to bury us alive
Sporting Director Michael Edwards and two former City scouts Dave Fallows and Julian Ward, who had made the move over to Anfield the year before the settlement was reached in September 2013, are the people in question alleged to have used the login details of a City scout to gain access to the system.Article from this is anfield website
That'll get loads of clicks. Keep the Red Cartel Morons happy for a few minutes.There is an article today that City will be expelled from all compeitions when found guilty !
They don't want to relegate us, they just want to bury us alive
Champions again in 2012
Well-Known Member
I'm sure he will be allowed to claim reasonable expensesWell that’s not fair on the lad.
Butties cost £13 a pop down there, hope he’s took a packed lunch.
Kelechi Iheanacho
Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2016
- Messages
- 12
Apologies if it’s a stupid question, but on the more serious allegations (I.e sponsorship) is there any middle ground or is it simply we did it or we didn’t? Basically, is it either a huge punishment or no punishment…or could they decide on a smaller punishment for a ‘technical’ breach or something like that?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Surely the IC will have all read everything beforehand?The IC would have read the written openings which will refer them to the parties’ key documents and positions. They will be taken through the documents in more detail through the hearing.
And if so, be remunerated for that time.