PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Why would Etihad need Sheikh Mansour to pay the majority of their sponsorship contract when they were turning over billions of USD per annum? Looks like they can afford to pay it themselves which was confirmed at CAS.
This!

Also why would Mansour task the higher ups at City with covering his money and speaking about it so openly? Far too risky, anyone could hack your emails. This is exactly what happened.

If the Sheikh was indeed disguising owner investment then I very much doubt the actually task of carrying out said disguisement would have gotten any further than Khaldoon not some senior executive!

Either that or we were so brazen that we didn’t care and paid everyone erm consultancy fees.

It’s fucking nuts and stupid and that’s why it didn’t happen. Creative accounting is not fraud.
 
Because they thought/hoped we might take it?
But if they wanted us to accept an offer, and cause us ‘guilt by association’ , then they would surely offered us something too good to turn down???! By the way I’m Not disagreeing with anything you say Chris, cos I don’t believe they offered us a deal anyway, my point being why not offer us something we couldn’t turn down if they wanted us to accept??
 
I’m pretty sceptical that a six-point deduction will have been offered.
No idea where it was originally posted that a 6 point deduction was offered but it’s obviously complete bollocks.

Why would the PL offer a 6 point settlement to City at pretty much the same time they were recommending the IC punish more than that for Forest and Everton for minor PSR transgressions.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.