waiting impatiently on the Chelsea charges. Chelsea self reported lot of crimes from Abra era, but for some reason PL needs to spend long months on it. Uefa looked at is and gave them a punishment July 2023. Now October 2024 we still wait for PL to decide ...
imo PL is in bit of a limbo after giving harsh punishment to Everton and Forest for failing PSR limit by few millions, what should they give to Chelsea who may not break recent limits (due to absurd spending with 9 year contracts and hotel sales:D)but provide incomplete financial details for a decade. feels like because these are self reported not much argument can be had, maybe factor in that they self reported as a good sign but still it imo much worse with apparently secret agent fees paid outside the costs showed by Chelsea and all that.
can they really hand out only a fine to Chelsea? despite self reporting these are not minor things, some of them probably 5-10-20x difference that what we may or may not paid Mancini for example outside the rules.
really interested of what Chelsea will get and when as it was said this case will be done sooner than our 115 case, which is midway through the hearing almost with a decision likely in 3-6 months. wonder if we find out the Chelsea verdict by end of the year.
I am sure Masters wishes these were not self reported and also the longer it takes more legal fees wasted on this as well paid by the clubs end of the day.
just dont know how Uefa came to a conclusion over this 14 months ago and PL not yet.
On July 28, UEFA announced they had fined Chelsea €10m (£8.6m) for "submitting incomplete financial information" between 2012 and 2019.
media witchhunt at Chelsea and talk of asterisks also not comparable to what we receive daily in over a decade.
what will be fun to see how media reports once PL brings the verdict. "honest Chelsea" etc.
imo PL is in bit of a limbo after giving harsh punishment to Everton and Forest for failing PSR limit by few millions, what should they give to Chelsea who may not break recent limits (due to absurd spending with 9 year contracts and hotel sales:D)but provide incomplete financial details for a decade. feels like because these are self reported not much argument can be had, maybe factor in that they self reported as a good sign but still it imo much worse with apparently secret agent fees paid outside the costs showed by Chelsea and all that.
can they really hand out only a fine to Chelsea? despite self reporting these are not minor things, some of them probably 5-10-20x difference that what we may or may not paid Mancini for example outside the rules.
really interested of what Chelsea will get and when as it was said this case will be done sooner than our 115 case, which is midway through the hearing almost with a decision likely in 3-6 months. wonder if we find out the Chelsea verdict by end of the year.
I am sure Masters wishes these were not self reported and also the longer it takes more legal fees wasted on this as well paid by the clubs end of the day.
just dont know how Uefa came to a conclusion over this 14 months ago and PL not yet.
On July 28, UEFA announced they had fined Chelsea €10m (£8.6m) for "submitting incomplete financial information" between 2012 and 2019.
media witchhunt at Chelsea and talk of asterisks also not comparable to what we receive daily in over a decade.
what will be fun to see how media reports once PL brings the verdict. "honest Chelsea" etc.