You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
bluedave1894
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 186
That's it bud, 40 years ago maybe!Yes… Thick as fuck… the actual quote was…
I couldn't settle in Italy - it was like living in a foreign country.
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
Anyone else thinking this is the same guy?
Listen to how he constructs his sentences and the pauses as he works out his next bag of bollocks
and
Just another clickbait video, the video attracted this mouth breathing **** along with many others.
@Ozone280
1 year agoIf City get the boot from the Premier League the City should not be allowed back in until their owners have changed
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,339
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Anyone else thinking this is the same guy?
Listen to how he constructs his sentences and the pauses as he works out his next bag of bollocks
and
I ran it through AI and it said Nick Harris is a knobhead.
bumbleblue
Well-Known Member
Anyone else thinking this is the same guy?
Listen to how he constructs his sentences and the pauses as he works out his next bag of bollocks
and
No way I am clicking on any of that fucking toxic waste. Fuck Nick Harris and all the rag/dipper client shills.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,609
- Team supported
- Manchester City
You need to ask a lawyer for that :)
I suppose their are three scenarios:
- the PL can't prove the allegations to the satisfaction of the panel
- the PL can prove the allegations
- the PL can prove the allegations and a criminal investigation follows.
I have no idea if Etihad, for example, could take action against the PL in any of those three situations, tbh.
Well the pl are accusing Etihad Airways of being cohoots with City to fiddle the books. I'm no expert but I don't see why Etihad Airways couldn't claim damages against the pl, in the same way City could claim damages once we are cleared.
You cannt accuse huge multi billion companies of fraud and not expect them to hit back once cleared.
It's an unusual commercial arrangement whereby one company freely enters a contract to pay another company and a trade body intervenes to reduce the price agreed.Well the pl are accusing Etihad Airways of being cohoots with City to fiddle the books. I'm no expert but I don't see why Etihad Airways couldn't claim damages against the pl, in the same way City could claim damages once we are cleared.
You cannt accuse huge multi billion companies of fraud and not expect them to hit back once cleared.
In the present case, Etihad are not a party to it. Even if the PL won, City may be bound by PL rules not to go to an external court to appeal, but if it mounts to an accusation of fraud by the sponsor, is there anything to stop the sponsor suing for defamation?
Alternatively, if the judgment is that it was fraudulent, what happens if the club reports itself to the police for fraud, the Crown Prosecution Service reviews the evidence and says there's no prospect of a conviction? (And just imagine the DPP supports one of the PL rivals!)