PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Your handy cutout and keep guide to the 2 types of reporting when the verdict is reached:

Corrupt City guilty in PL case, see pages 2-6,8,10-14 and comment on page 16


PL Club has outcome - see page 84 in Stockport edition
Arsenal, United and Liverpool are the bestest Eva clubs, see pages 2-6,8,10-14 and comment on page 16
 
Invisible Man's Bandage said:
There is no news of note. The hearing was scheduled for ten weeks, it looks like it will run for ten weeks, finish at the end of next week and then we can expect a judgment in several months.

I still think March for the outcome.
Click to expand...
Can't see everything being kept quiet until then.

It will be good news and we will certainly release stuff one way or another.

There is a january window to navigate which could be huge for our season.
 
ysmsa said:
Can't see everything being kept quiet until then.

It will be good news and we will certainly release stuff one way or another.

There is a january window to navigate which could be huge for our season.
Click to expand...
Until the panel release their judgement then the rest is just froth. Both sides could brief that they have done well but it means nothing. As the club seemingly haven't briefed at all in the entire process I wouldn't expect it now anyway.
 
halfcenturyup said:
On your first point, I find it incredible that that is apparently legal. Sure, for the good if the sport, only put what the PL considers as fmv income in the FFP P/L. But no, they gave given themselves the authority to tell a third party, not governed by PL contract and very likely in a different country, to enter into a new contract for a lower amount. They have even given themselves the power to increase the amount the third party pays if they consider it undervalued. I still can't understand how that is legal.

On your other two points, I have been saying that since early last year. It's one of the many reasons I think the PL doesn't have a chance of finding the club guilty of the most serious charges. What panel is going to make a "guilty" finding then to have a criminal investigation not even started, refused on the grounds of insufficient evidence or to have one concluded without a guilty verdict. Yes, the lawyers can talk about different jurisdictions with different standards of proof, but it would be hugely destructive to the reputation of the PL and its disciplinary procedures. I am pretty sure the panel will bear that in mind when coming to their conclusions even applying a higher standard of proof than usual. Super-cogency, if you will.
Click to expand...
I would have said the same but somehow we are here with these proceedings despite arguments over jurisdiction at the beginning. Presumably for this reason. In which the court found against city in favor of premier league surely the correct setting was court but apparently not
 
halfcenturyup said:
On your first point, I find it incredible that that is apparently legal. Sure, for the good if the sport, only put what the PL considers as fmv income in the FFP P/L. But no, they gave given themselves the authority to tell a third party, not governed by PL contract and very likely in a different country, to enter into a new contract for a lower amount. They have even given themselves the power to increase the amount the third party pays if they consider it undervalued. I still can't understand how that is legal.
Click to expand...
Are you sure about this? How would that work?
 
MCFC84000 said:
Anyone else thinking this is the same guy?
Listen to how he constructs his sentences and the pauses as he works out his next bag of bollocks

and
Click to expand...

I the first video whoever it is says that UEFA only had like 6 emails and said they where ok without the other evidence they where trying to get through discovery. That surely cannot be true
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.