PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

*makes mental note not to believe anything he says in future*

:-)

Always good advice when reading the rubbish I post on here.

Actually the rules say if a contract hasn't been executed before being presented to the PL then it should be adjusted to whatever the PL says is fmv (so presumably up or down). If the contract has been executed it should either be cancelled or be amended if it relates to income and is overstated, or to expense and is understated. Executed I have taken to mean signed and legally binding (unless the PL says so, which is my problem).

Anyway, so I was half right, which is pretty good going for me :)

All needlessly complicated though.

1000000944.png
1000000946.png
 
Always good advice when reading the rubbish I post on here.

Actually the rules say if a contract hasn't been executed before being presented to the PL then it should be adjusted to whatever the PL says is fmv (so presumably up or down). If the contract has been executed it should either be cancelled or be amended if it relates to income and is overstated, or to expense and is understated. Executed I have taken to mean signed and legally binding (unless the PL says so, which is my problem).

Anyway, so I was half right, which is pretty good going for me :)

All needlessly complicated though.

View attachment 137704
View attachment 137706
But if the deal is below what they consider to be FMV they'll just confirm that it's at FMV and allow it.
We think it's worth £10 but your only being offered £8, so that's fine
 
But if the deal is below what they consider to be FMV they'll just confirm that it's at FMV and allow it.
We think it's worth £10 but your only being offered £8, so that's fine

That's not what the rules say, but who knows how that would work in practice? Which is always the problem with complicated rules. Just look at offside and handball.

Things always get too complicated when people try to be too clever.
 
That's not what the rules say, but who knows how that would work in practice? Which is always the problem with complicated rules. Just look at offside and handball.

Things always get too complicated when people try to be too clever.
I think you're looking for complication that doesn't exist. The purpose of the rules are to ensure clubs don't get deals that are higher than FMV, not that they only get deals that are bang on FMV
 
Can't see everything being kept quiet until then.

It will be good news and we will certainly release stuff one way or another.

There is a january window to navigate which could be huge for our season.

Both sides will have a feel for how it’s gone.

Won’t take long before the hints start leaking out.
 
Both sides will have a feel for how it’s gone.

Won’t take long before the hints start leaking out.
Even if that happens it will be meaningless. The only thing that matters is the panel's released judgment and that is months off.

Either side might feel it has gone in their favour but the panel could easily come up with one of these...

1000116440.jpg
 
That's not what the rules say, but who knows how that would work in practice? Which is always the problem with complicated rules. Just look at offside and handball.

Things always get too complicated when people try to be too clever.

FMV isn’t as objective as the PL imply. You just know Nielsen will be doing what the PL require and placing huge emphasis on history etc….
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.