Bert Trautmann, Uwe Rosler, Stefan Ortega Moreno, Ilkay Gundogan...Zee German c***ts if you don’t mind ;)
Bert Trautmann, Uwe Rosler, Stefan Ortega Moreno, Ilkay Gundogan...Zee German c***ts if you don’t mind ;)
Bert Trautmann, Uwe Rosler, Stefan Ortega Moreno, Ilkay Gundogan...
They're players you'd want to forget.You forgot Eike Immel, Micheal Fronzek, Mauritzio Gaudino and Stefan Karl from that esteemed list.
What about that loveable chap we hijacked from BoltonYou forgot Eike Immel, Micheal Fronzek, Mauritzio Gaudino and Stefan Karl from that esteemed list.
Now that would be the basis for a right fkin team!You forgot Eike Immel, Micheal Fronzek, Mauritzio Gaudino and Stefan Karl from that esteemed list.
Now that would be the basis for a right fkin team!
City to blame for potential Post Office Closures.The post office are trying to take our number away from us.
BBC News - Post Office could close 115 branches with jobs at risk
Post Office could close 115 branches with jobs at risk
Hundreds of head office workers are facing cuts and loss-making branches are under threat of closure.www.bbc.com
I think you know the answer. For those with negative motives this is build up as the trial of the century. They are fueling speculation that a finding in favour of the PL opens up allsorts of opportunities for others to do us down. We better not lose.Dozens of clubs have admitted breaching FFP rules in the last decade, others have admitted breaking rules about using ineligible players or fallen foul of other PL regulations. You could argue that all these cases could have affected a club's final position in the league table and so impacted on everyone financially. So why is it just City being targeted by other clubs for possible legal action (assuming we are even "found guilty.") Or is it just part of the relentless negative campaign (driven by people with dubious motives) we have suffered for years?
Clubs must go to arbitration through the PL, so they are just informing the PL of their intent. I think that stops the clock.It's just lawyers being lawyers, time barring applies to any claims so they're just being diligent. Most cases aren't as "historical" as ours, so I suppose it's not normally necessary.