PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Carragher simply hasn't read the details. I'm not sure he's read the Der Spiegel report. I'm not convinced, deep down, he understand the accusations. I don't think he read and/or understood the CAS report, or what the time barred really meant.

Obviously - obviously - City have taken advantage of their links with commercial partners attached to the club. Like United, like Leicester, like Bayern, like Stoke, like Juventus like [insert a dozen other football clubs]. But obviously those links are mutually beneficial for those sponsors. But City are the most successful club in England over the last decade, are on TV more regularly than anyone, and have exploited emerging commercial markets in creative ways as you would expect directors who are at the cutting edge of European football. He still seems to think that Real Madrid should be top of the table because they sell more shirts and have more Facebook followers. Well, if Spurs made £442.8m, having not won a trophy in a decade while in the UEFA conference league, why shouldn't City have made £619.1m winning the league and getting to the semi finals of the CL? That sounds about right to me.
So we’ve established spitty can’t read, it’s a lot easier to establish what an utter **** he is…!
 
I rekon if we get found guilty I think the super league will rear its head again and this time I'd probably back it, its amazing that they're charging us for financial breaches there just out to get us and the premier league are so corrupt
if we are found guilty we wouldn't be invited
 
The more I think of it.. the more I think relegation would be off the cards (and stripping titles)

City has Pep and Haaland, two of the biggest stars and attractions in world football, playing in the Premier League. City has rivalries with United and Liverpool, big for TV deals views.
TV companies paying for the Premier League product wont be happy losing City, Haaland et al.

City owners have pumped millions into the UK economy, the UK Government wont take kindly to them being fucked over.

Stripping titles leaves open the chance for lawsuits from clubs who were relegated or missed out on money from previous wins/champions league.

£100 M Fine, 15 points deduction and 2 Transfer window bans (after Summer). I think most would accept that?
Bollox they would.
 
Well if the police have decent evidence you might have done a murder, you refuse to co-operate, and then at trial produce a load of stuff they had asked you for and you'd refused you might still get off but the judge might charge you for wasting everyone's time.
But the CPS might drop the murder case for lack of evidence. My point is we cannot be charged for dodgy financial just because we did not provide the proof or more specifically the proof they asked for which might include a load of commercial sensitive stuff and perhaps stuff that is beyond there scope / jurisdiction financials of sponsors and not in our gift to give

Remember who runs the show our rival they would love our sponsor info. They seem to have a clear agenda to say that sponsors are more connected to us than they are related party etc
 
Carragher simply hasn't read the details. I'm not sure he's read the Der Spiegel report. I'm not convinced, deep down, he understand the accusations. I don't think he read and/or understood the CAS report, or what the time barred really meant.

Obviously - obviously - City have taken advantage of their links with commercial partners attached to the club. Like United, like Leicester, like Bayern, like Stoke, like Juventus like [insert a dozen other football clubs]. But obviously those links are mutually beneficial for those sponsors. But City are the most successful club in England over the last decade, are on TV more regularly than anyone, and have exploited emerging commercial markets in creative ways as you would expect directors who are at the cutting edge of European football. Txiki Begiristain proposed all this at Barcelona, and the dinosaurs there saw him off for it, so he took the template and brought it to rainy Manchester cos he'd figured out business plans and football plans that the rest of European football are now trying to copy. Carragher still seems to think that Real Madrid should be top of the table because they sell more shirts and have more Facebook followers. Well, if Spurs made £442.8m, having not won a trophy in a decade while in the UEFA conference league, why shouldn't City have made £619.1m winning the league and getting to the semi finals of the CL? That sounds about right to me.

Carragher isn't interested inthe truth, fact or detail - he's just another entitled and gobby dipper who is hurting because the cunts he supports are nowhere near our level.
 
I think the point below indicates that we're using the same strategy as we did with UEFA, we keep the powder dry until the independent & impartial hearing.

5. In respect of the period from December 2018 to date, the Premier League Rules applicable in the relevant Seasons requiring a member club to cooperate with, and assist, the Premier League in its investigations, including by providing documents and information to the Premier League in the utmost good faith, namely:
 
Fantastic article. Genuinely.

If only every fucker read it and took it in.
It is. Love the last sentence.
Years mate! Genuinely. And thank you! I've got a sneaky feeling city will prevail
are you the chap in the sky debate with Neville? If so very well played mate. Proud to watch that. You were brilliant. If it wasn’t you sorry, who was it as want to pay them on the virtual back.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.