manimanc
Well-Known Member
Tells you everything mate.The same sky sports who wouldn’t shut up about the World Cup in Qatar and their human rights laws are now creaming themselves at them taking over the scum!
Tells you everything mate.The same sky sports who wouldn’t shut up about the World Cup in Qatar and their human rights laws are now creaming themselves at them taking over the scum!
So we’ve established spitty can’t read, it’s a lot easier to establish what an utter **** he is…!Carragher simply hasn't read the details. I'm not sure he's read the Der Spiegel report. I'm not convinced, deep down, he understand the accusations. I don't think he read and/or understood the CAS report, or what the time barred really meant.
Obviously - obviously - City have taken advantage of their links with commercial partners attached to the club. Like United, like Leicester, like Bayern, like Stoke, like Juventus like [insert a dozen other football clubs]. But obviously those links are mutually beneficial for those sponsors. But City are the most successful club in England over the last decade, are on TV more regularly than anyone, and have exploited emerging commercial markets in creative ways as you would expect directors who are at the cutting edge of European football. He still seems to think that Real Madrid should be top of the table because they sell more shirts and have more Facebook followers. Well, if Spurs made £442.8m, having not won a trophy in a decade while in the UEFA conference league, why shouldn't City have made £619.1m winning the league and getting to the semi finals of the CL? That sounds about right to me.
Always like the Hammers, even with their free ground and dodgy Argentinian transfers :-)Samuel's is a West Ham so not in the pocket of the Red Stains, unlike 90% of the other wankers.
if we are found guilty we wouldn't be invitedI rekon if we get found guilty I think the super league will rear its head again and this time I'd probably back it, its amazing that they're charging us for financial breaches there just out to get us and the premier league are so corrupt
Bollox they would.The more I think of it.. the more I think relegation would be off the cards (and stripping titles)
City has Pep and Haaland, two of the biggest stars and attractions in world football, playing in the Premier League. City has rivalries with United and Liverpool, big for TV deals views.
TV companies paying for the Premier League product wont be happy losing City, Haaland et al.
City owners have pumped millions into the UK economy, the UK Government wont take kindly to them being fucked over.
Stripping titles leaves open the chance for lawsuits from clubs who were relegated or missed out on money from previous wins/champions league.
£100 M Fine, 15 points deduction and 2 Transfer window bans (after Summer). I think most would accept that?
But the CPS might drop the murder case for lack of evidence. My point is we cannot be charged for dodgy financial just because we did not provide the proof or more specifically the proof they asked for which might include a load of commercial sensitive stuff and perhaps stuff that is beyond there scope / jurisdiction financials of sponsors and not in our gift to giveWell if the police have decent evidence you might have done a murder, you refuse to co-operate, and then at trial produce a load of stuff they had asked you for and you'd refused you might still get off but the judge might charge you for wasting everyone's time.
Carragher simply hasn't read the details. I'm not sure he's read the Der Spiegel report. I'm not convinced, deep down, he understand the accusations. I don't think he read and/or understood the CAS report, or what the time barred really meant.
Obviously - obviously - City have taken advantage of their links with commercial partners attached to the club. Like United, like Leicester, like Bayern, like Stoke, like Juventus like [insert a dozen other football clubs]. But obviously those links are mutually beneficial for those sponsors. But City are the most successful club in England over the last decade, are on TV more regularly than anyone, and have exploited emerging commercial markets in creative ways as you would expect directors who are at the cutting edge of European football. Txiki Begiristain proposed all this at Barcelona, and the dinosaurs there saw him off for it, so he took the template and brought it to rainy Manchester cos he'd figured out business plans and football plans that the rest of European football are now trying to copy. Carragher still seems to think that Real Madrid should be top of the table because they sell more shirts and have more Facebook followers. Well, if Spurs made £442.8m, having not won a trophy in a decade while in the UEFA conference league, why shouldn't City have made £619.1m winning the league and getting to the semi finals of the CL? That sounds about right to me.
It is. Love the last sentence.Fantastic article. Genuinely.
If only every fucker read it and took it in.
are you the chap in the sky debate with Neville? If so very well played mate. Proud to watch that. You were brilliant. If it wasn’t you sorry, who was it as want to pay them on the virtual back.Years mate! Genuinely. And thank you! I've got a sneaky feeling city will prevail
Yes mateIs he the thick twat that moaned about us taking their best players and referenced Kolo? I turned off that point