PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Mancini was a City employee. We'd have had a big say in any side employment he had. And I assume we'd want everything to be above board. But the Mancini issue is less than £1.5m a year over 3 years. It's nothing. Doesn't make any difference one way or another. At the very worst we might get hit with a £0.5m fine. And that's the very worst.

I agree, I don’t think the punishment will be great for it. Just saying that if we had done any wrongdoing, that one is one that would need a bit of explaining (which I also think is still doable).
 
Mancini was a City employee. We'd have had a big say in any side employment he had. And I assume we'd want everything to be above board. But the Mancini issue is less than £1.5m a year over 3 years. It's nothing. Doesn't make any difference one way or another. At the very worst we might get hit with a £0.5m fine. And that's the very worst.
Interesting stuff
 
There is a right of appeal in certain very specific circumstances.
Which, if our evidence is 'irrefutable', should be exercised in the event of a negative outcome. It is impossible to conceive a scenario whereby a negative outcome wouldn't attract a right of appeal, because an error of law could not be avoided in the light of 'irrefutable' evidence.
 
Any idea where this talk of a whistleblower has come from? I read that it was Sam Lee on Twitter but read his article and there is nothing about whistleblowing in it.
To be honest, I’ve only really seen it suggested on here. Not as fact but as a possible reason as to why the PL might be going all in on us with so many charges because outside of the hacked e-mails and Der Spiegel articles, what more have the Premier League got to think they might get a better outcome than UEFA got at CAS?
 
Mancini was a City employee. We'd have had a big say in any side employment he had. And I assume we'd want everything to be above board. But the Mancini issue is less than £1.5m a year over 3 years. It's nothing. Doesn't make any difference one way or another. At the very worst we might get hit with a £0.5m fine. And that's the very worst.
Am I right in thinking that the Mancini thing isn’t even an issue that falls under possible breaches of FFP, given that Premier League FFP only came in at the start of the 2013/14 season and Mancini had left the club by then anyway?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.