halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,104
Ah, yes. The Mastermind chair.I’d use of these to wire them up.
Ah, yes. The Mastermind chair.I’d use of these to wire them up.
I thought this. If the recording shows they were up to no good this would only be bad news for the PGMOL and the PL would not care. Only way this would hurt PL is if there is another voice on the recording that is from PL and not the ref or VAR team.And another thing
Couldn’t the PL just distance themselves from the PGMOL?
Are they separate entities?
You need to catch up to the dirty dossier and quick!I'm 50 pages behind so someone might have answered this.
If not:
The relationship between City and the PL is essentially contractual. The regulations that govern our participation within that league are the terms of the contract. One of those terms is that in the event of an alleged breach of the rules the matter is referred to an independent panel, from which an appeal lies to a further panel.
We are said to be in breach of those terms. The fact that the terms themselves do not contain a limitation clause makes no difference, because the Limitation Act says that if you are alleging a breach of contract you must do it within six years.
So, there is a limitation period, and it is six years.
However.
The limitation act also says that if you are bringing a claim based on the fraud of the other party the limitation period does not start to run until you had knowledge of the fraud. So the six year period begins not with the date of the breaches, but the date those breaches became known to the PL - IF they were breaches brought about by fraud.
This means that the allegation of fraud is relevant in two ways. First, given that our accounts have been passed by an auditor, the PL have to allege fraud in order to make their case stick. Secondly, if they can't establish fraud, the limitation act means anything before February 2017 is time-barred.
They have charged us with something extremely serious. The consequences for City if the case succeeds are potentially devastating. The consequences for the PL if the charges fail is also potentially devastating.
Yes it was during early 2020.There was a few stories on here going about. Liverpool directors being carted off in handcuffs was one off them.
Ref wasn't too bad away at the Emirates last season.City haven't had a favorable decision at home or away v dippers, rags or arse. PL / VAR corrupt as fuck as stated above. Please let this info be right. In fact every time we play the scouse cunts we get done over
with refs/VAR.
Thanks DD....I think ;)
It would depend on who the information has been passed to. If my information is correct, in one sentence, there is full vindication of the "clear and obvious" mantra that our club have put out there already.
It does make you wonder what what discussed in the EPL London meeting last week, and why it was reported that certain CEO's were more than happy to shake the hand of our CEO at said meeting....whilst certain others were cosied up gnashing their collective teeth.
We all slag the broadcasters off, but maybe...just maybe...we have the broadcasting whistleblower to end all whistleblowers.
Just sayin.
City were caught off guard when they made the charges public , not even the press were briefed prior .If you have a top secret dossier full of kompromat, you don't wait until you've been very publicly charged with 115 offences and had your reputation destroyed in the media before using it.
I want the victims to be sailing down shit creek, after a bad dose of the runs without a paddle and a boat whilst their lying mouths are held open!!this white paper has them all selling as fast as they can, going to be funny watching Liverpool sailing down shit creek without a paddle!
Fair enough I hope you're rightThat the club is welcoming an opportunity to clear their name once and for all without doing whatever else they think is necessary to get the outcome they want?