abu13
Well-Known Member
So, if I am understanding this correctly Everton are docked 10 points for failing FFP by £20+ million but a team can be £1 billion in debt and thats all fine an dandy?
I guess it depends on age and profile of the player etcJuventus got round that problem by keeping the big stars contracts and loaning them to other clubs.
Exactly-madnessSo, if I am understanding this correctly Everton are docked 10 points for failing FFP by £20+ million but a team can be £1 billion in debt and thats all fine an dandy?
Not a chance of that happeningAbsolute worst scenario.
We get found guilty as hell.
We get relegated,.......................................................................................................... and then bounce straight back up and win everything in sight again and boil gallons more piss.
One look at that the players they have bought in the past decade would tell you just how that club is run. They havent a clue.Finally, finally....an in-depth look at what Everton's defence was and how ridiculous it became. It's an article on the Telegraph site, won't link as you need a subscription, and it shows that Everton had lots of assistance from the PL for a long period to ensure that they didn't fail. They ignored it. They then came up with increasingly bizarre explanations after admitting they had.
Being devil's advocate here.Personally I think that's not the best way to frame it from Stefan. I think it's completely excessive to deduct 10 points from Everton and I would expect it will be mitigated on appeal. But even if it isn't, they failed the PL's FFP. That's binary; you either pass, if your aggregate losses over a 3-year period are £105m or less, or if they're £106m or more, you fail.
Even if City were to be found to have breached all 115 instances, that still doesn't mean we'd have failed FFP, certainly not given the likely amounts involved. And there's very little that goes past 2015 it would seem, certainly only up to 2018 at the latest.
I reckon there's no more than £20m a year involved in the disputed payments. Thats not anywhere near deserving of relegation.
Shame a few of those mentioned voted for it a few years ago….
The problem being at least 2 maybe even 3 of those won’t be in the premier league soonCity.
Newcastle.
Chelsea.
Everton.
Burnley.
Sheffield United.
Wolves.
It's a growing voting block within the Premier League, and the red shirts are fearful of it.
Yes they are, safe as houses. The souvenir trophies we will receive for the treble will be posted shortly to us season ticket holders and they cannot be taken back by the red tops, sorry premier league, FA and UEFA.Someone tell me are our titles safe and the trophies we have won along the way?
Live with it?.... I'll fucking embrace it as a badge of pride.I must have read 100s of comments today saying that if we are exonerated, it will be because we have expensive lawyers and have been paying bribes. Some fans of other clubs will never accept our innocence. Guess we will just have to live with it.
Well said mateThey new it would take years to get an outcome and the media every month could write an article about it and every media outlet can praise us then at the end say but.. 115
Just hope when we are cleared Khaldoon will go to town on the media and certain clubs..
We wouldn’t be in the Champs the following year unless we won itIf all staff/players took siege mentality and decided to stay would relegation be that damaging? We would be still be in the champions league and would come straight back up.
Its funny how Stefan is now a quoted expert on the 115, yet if I remember rightly he said City would get off at CAS and no one, nick harris included, quoted him then. Indeed the ping pong cheat from the Times said all City supporters were rats before the hearing. Unfortunately Stefans views on this fit with the medias hopes and so they have jumped on them. As in all memories I could be wrong, again;-)
He’s not said anything wrong. If we are found guilty, it’s a more serious breech than Everton’s. The PL are accusing us of committing fraud.Its funny how Stefan is now a quoted expert on the 115, yet if I remember rightly he said City would get off at CAS and no one, nick harris included, quoted him then. Indeed the ping pong cheat from the Times said all City supporters were rats before the hearing. Unfortunately Stefans views on this fit with the medias hopes and so they have jumped on them. As in all memories I could be wrong, again;-)
Exactly, and the red scum all know that, I include much of the media in that.The problem with all this is that even if we are exonerated
we are already tarnished and have suffered massive damage to our reputation