PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Oystercatcher28]

Just sat down and looked at a few of these allegations. As me Gran used to say, "nothing doing."

1. In respect of each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those seasons that required provision by a member club to the Premier League, in the utmost good faith, of accurate financial information that gives a true and fair view of the club’s financial position, in particular with respect to its revenue (including sponsorship revenue), its related parties and its operating costs, namely:
(a) for Season 2009/10, Premier League Rules B.13, C.71, C.72, C.75 (amended to C.79 from 10 September 2009 for the remainder of Season 2009/10) and C.80;
(b) for Season 2010/11, Premier League Rules B.13, C.78, C.79, C.86 and C.87;
(c) for Season 2011/12, Premier League Rules B.13, E.3, 4, E.11 and E.12;
(d) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules 16, E.3, E.4, E.11 and E.12;
(e) for Season 2013/14, Premier League Rules 15, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.49;
(f) for Season 2014/15, Premier League Rules 16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.50;
(g) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules 16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.50;
(h) for Season 2016/17, Premier League Rules16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.51; and
(i) for Season 2017/18, Premier League Rules B.16, 3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.51.

2. In respect of:
(a) each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2012/13 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with its manager, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2009/10 to 2011/12 inclusive, Premier League Rules Q.7 and Q.8; and
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules P.7 and P.8; and
(b) each of Seasons 2010/11 to 2015/16 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of player remuneration in its relevant contracts with its players, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2010/11 and 2011/12, Premier League Rules K.12 and K.20;
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules T.12 and T.20;
(3) for Seasons 2013/14 and 2014/15, Premier League Rules T.12 and T.19; and
(4) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules T.13 and T.20.

3. In respect of each of Seasons 2013/14 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to comply with UEFA’s regulations, including UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations, namely:
(a) for Season 2013/14, Premier League Rule B.14.6; and
(b) for Seasons 2014/15 to 2017/18 inclusive, Premier League Rule B.15.6.

4. In respect of each of the Seasons 2015/16 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons on Profitability and Sustainability, namely:
(a) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules E.52 to E.60; and
(b) for Seasons 2016/17 and 2017/18, Premier League Rules E.53 to E.60.

5. In respect of the period from December 2018 to date, the Premier League Rules applicable in the relevant Seasons requiring a member club to cooperate with, and assist, the Premier League in its investigations, including by providing documents and information to the Premier League in the utmost good faith, namely:
(a) for Season 2018/19, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(b) for Season 2019/20, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(c) for Season 2020/21, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(d) for Season 2021/22, Premier League Rules B.15, B.18, W.1, W.2, W.15 and W.16; and
(e) for Season 2022/23, Premier League Rules B.15, B.18, W.1, W.2, W.15 and W.16

In City we trust. Worst game of battleships ever.

 

[Stoned Rose]

COULD WE FACE A COMPO PILE ON ?

Two rulings were published yesterday. The "other one" has gone under the radar. It was triggered by a formal complaint to the PL by five clubs and was also referred to an Independent Commission (IC).

The five clubs Inc Leeds, Burnley etc requested 2 rights.

1 To be active participants in the IC hearing against Everton. NOT ALLOWED.
2 To establish the right to claim compensation against EFC if found guilty of gaining a sporting advantage. ALLOWED.

According to PL rules the 5 clubs must submit their compensation claims within 28 days.

How many clubs have filed a complaint to the PL seeking compensation against MCFC just in case we are clobbered ?. Why is not in the public domain. Eg Any club that finished 5th and missed out on a CL place.
if the club are now getting twitchy we may see signs of resilience planning. For example if KDB was transferred to Saudi in January for an amazing fee say £75M.

Can we transfer you to Saudi?

Ffs mate.

 

[Stoned Rose]

.

Pretty much my daily uniform tbf.

 

[levets]

Rosen has been a KC for 30 years now, with a long and respected career behind him. I can put your mind at rest now that he’s not going to bring himself or his chambers into disrepute by letting the football team he supports influence anything.

I read somewhere that our KC Pannick also supports Arsenal

 

[bulldogblue]

Mail online now in full flow with an article saying Everton could possibly pick up a further points deduction and then saying the EPL should not hold back with severe punishment to Chelsea and City if found guilty.

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

No. We can only refer to court over agregious failures with the actual process.

We can't appeal to anyone if we disagree with the verdict.

I'm hoping the independent regulator will sort out this ridiculous appeals process when in place.

 

[Dribble]

I'm hoping the independent regulator will sort out this ridiculous appeals process when in place.

Fingers crossed...

 

[its a Barm]

Just got thinking like you do when your board so if we got chucked into a lower league ( which by the way I don't think will happen ) would pep and all the players stay loyal to the club, I would like to think so.

 

[Len Rum]

No. We can only refer to court over agregious failures with the actual process.

We can't appeal to anyone if we disagree with the verdict.

Fair enough.
Doesn't seem right to me that an appeal panel verdict cannot be challenged if it is considered to be unlawful ( not the same as disagreeing with it).
But if that's the case so be it.

 

[citizen_maine]

Just got thinking like you do when your board so if we got chucked into a lower league ( which by the way I don't think will happen ) would pep and all the players stay loyal to the club, I would like to think so.

Thinking isn't for everyone