Bluewonder
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 3,575
Ah, that dumb **** Utd fan who adopted a name like Swiss Ramble to fool people into thinking he has a clue what he's talking about.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Even John Lennon would struggle to imagine thatImagine if Spurs had 643m to spend
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,913
Apparently long flights can have peculiar effects on the brain.
Making a poor attempt at Swiss ramble.Apparently long flights can have peculiar effects on the brain
That does not surprise me at all.Imagine if Spurs had 643m to spend.
Despite a lack of success, they do generate lots of money, and their new stadium has pushed up their income even more. They were not far off Liverpool in their last accounts.
The difference is that they have always been very careful spenders, so it would not shock me if their wages + player amortisation is much lower than any other club that size.
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
Yes but they don’t win anything. Is that not what top level sport is about? If you can generate that level of income, you need to be judged on silverware. Zip so it don’t matter how much they make.That does not surprise me at all.
Despite a lack of success, they do generate lots of money, and their new stadium has pushed up their income even more. They were not far off Liverpool in their last accounts.
The difference is that they have always been very careful spenders, so it would not shock me if their wages + player amortisation is much lower than any other club that size.
I was replying to a post which suggested there was no way Spurs had tons of money to spend.Yes but they don’t win anything. Is that not what top level sport is about? If you can generate that level of income, you need to be judged on silverware. Zip so it don’t matter how much they make.
They don't win anything, because they don't spend it.
Not sure this is possible to do without knowing the contract length of players, salaries and which players were sold to make up the net spend given that transfer fees are not all equal for ffp purposes.
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 7,094
Masters is an employee of the Premier League, which is owned by the 20 clubs in it.
However, with ManUre, the Dippers, ArseAnal & Spuds having power so heavily weighted in their favour, it's fair to say that Masters is merely the Cartel clubs' puppet.
They tell him to jump, he asks how high. They tell him to bend over, he asks dry or vaseline today. That's his job & if he doesn't like it, there are several arse-licking yes men waiting in the wings who're more than happy to replace him & take their orders from the Red Mafia & Spuds.
Exactly and Scudamore was no different. It’s always been down to the clubs. The difference potentially now is owners that actually want to invest may soon be the majority.
Tbf the cunts making the rules never actually envisaged relegation.I’m not sure they are exploiting a loophole.
If those are the rules that’s fine.
If the bent bastards who make the rules can’t get their act together it’s their fault- it’s not a loophole.