SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Cult followers ignore logic and are only interested in their warped beliefs.Like the old giffer on the rag stand said, City will probably get off but we all know they cheated. That's the retarded mentality of a rag.
Cult followers ignore logic and are only interested in their warped beliefs.Like the old giffer on the rag stand said, City will probably get off but we all know they cheated. That's the retarded mentality of a rag.
Like the old giffer on the rag stand said, City will probably get off but we all know they cheated. That's the retarded mentality of a rag.
That’s my thinking too.The talk that there are senior people in other clubs expecting City to be cleared of charges is interesting as non of the main stream media want to run with it as it’s a bad news story. With our departing COO going to Old Trafford to be CEO this must be coming from United. Radcliffe seems to want a better relationship with City than what’s happened in the past. It’s weird they’ve also voted with City rather than Liverpool on distribution of funds to the football league. The rags want something, I’d hazard a guess it’s our ground whilst the swamp is being demolished.
We still have months and months - probably years to face of this tainting.That mindset is a product of the reputational damage that the PL and media have inflicted upon City. No logic of 'innocent until proven guilty' has been applied to our situation, to many the official outcome is now irrelevant.
Obviously I sincerely hope we're cleared, but I also hope the response from City is significant in terms of compensation sought for the damage done to the reputation of the club.
Ratboy even said on the overlap “if City get off”Like the old giffer on the rag stand said, City will probably get off but we all know they cheated. That's the retarded mentality of a rag.
I hardly think agreeing to the deal package with the EFL has anything to do with siding with City. I’m sure both clubs are not massively arsed. Voting the same as City is not cosying up as a city get no benefit from that deal ???The talk that there are senior people in other clubs expecting City to be cleared of charges is interesting as non of the main stream media want to run with it as it’s a bad news story. With our departing COO going to Old Trafford to be CEO this must be coming from United. Radcliffe seems to want a better relationship with City than what’s happened in the past. It’s weird they’ve also voted with City rather than Liverpool on distribution of funds to the football league. The rags want something, I’d hazard a guess it’s our ground whilst the swamp is being demolished.
I’d let them have the minihadThat’s my thinking too.
I think/hope we see protests from our fans if the club decide to play nice and let them use our ground.
I’ve backed our ownership 100% but if they let that happen I would be giving up my season ticket for starters.
We’ve done it before and the thanks we got was them mocking us at every opportunity.
That banner, “noisy neighbours”, “not in my lifetime” and not to mention the thing this thread is about.
They are the driving force behind these charges.
They want us gone, not just out of the league but out of business.
We’ve played nice, we’ve let things slide which from a business standpoint I understand, I don’t like it but I understand it.
If that was to happen it would be unforgivable imo.
I wouldn’t give them the steam off my piss.I’d let them have the minihad
I doubt they'd fill itI’d let them have the minihad