PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Doesn’t help when Spitty and Ratboy perpetuate the lies. Spitty showed his colours and Ratboy went into defensive mode when talking about related party sponsorship(which he hasn’t got the first fuckin idea about anyway).

Pep should tell the pair of them to fuck off on the next Sky tv game
 
I'm Blue said:
Have you read the comments?
Hahahahaha the toxicity is off the scale.
If when we’re cleared we’re gonna be boiling piss on an industrial level : )
Click to expand...

The talk that there are senior people in other clubs expecting City to be cleared of charges is interesting as non of the main stream media want to run with it as it’s a bad news story. With our departing COO going to Old Trafford to be CEO this must be coming from United. Radcliffe seems to want a better relationship with City than what’s happened in the past. It’s weird they’ve also voted with City rather than Liverpool on distribution of funds to the football league. The rags want something, I’d hazard a guess it’s our ground whilst the swamp is being demolished.
 
remember arthur mann said:
Like the old giffer on the rag stand said, City will probably get off but we all know they cheated. That's the retarded mentality of a rag.
Click to expand...

That mindset is a product of the reputational damage that the PL and media have inflicted upon City. No logic of 'innocent until proven guilty' has been applied to our situation, to many the official outcome is now irrelevant.

Obviously I sincerely hope we're cleared, but I also hope the response from City is significant in terms of compensation sought for the damage done to the reputation of the club.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
The talk that there are senior people in other clubs expecting City to be cleared of charges is interesting as non of the main stream media want to run with it as it’s a bad news story. With our departing COO going to Old Trafford to be CEO this must be coming from United. Radcliffe seems to want a better relationship with City than what’s happened in the past. It’s weird they’ve also voted with City rather than Liverpool on distribution of funds to the football league. The rags want something, I’d hazard a guess it’s our ground whilst the swamp is being demolished.
Click to expand...
That’s my thinking too.
I think/hope we see protests from our fans if the club decide to play nice and let them use our ground.
I’ve backed our ownership 100% but if they let that happen I would be giving up my season ticket for starters.
We’ve done it before and the thanks we got was them mocking us at every opportunity.
That banner, “noisy neighbours”, “not in my lifetime” and not to mention the thing this thread is about.
They are the driving force behind these charges.
They want us gone, not just out of the league but out of business.
We’ve played nice, we’ve let things slide which from a business standpoint I understand, I don’t like it but I understand it.
If that was to happen it would be unforgivable imo.
 
Bellamy's Caddy said:
That mindset is a product of the reputational damage that the PL and media have inflicted upon City. No logic of 'innocent until proven guilty' has been applied to our situation, to many the official outcome is now irrelevant.

Obviously I sincerely hope we're cleared, but I also hope the response from City is significant in terms of compensation sought for the damage done to the reputation of the club.
Click to expand...
We still have months and months - probably years to face of this tainting.

It’s reached the stage where it pointless watching tv , listening to radio, reading papers or looking online for anything football related.

No idea what options the club has - but doing nothing and waiting for years and years of this shit can’t be the right thing.
 
remember arthur mann said:
Like the old giffer on the rag stand said, City will probably get off but we all know they cheated. That's the retarded mentality of a rag.
Click to expand...
Ratboy even said on the overlap “if City get off”
That’s the mindset of everyone else.
Luckily I don’t care what anyone else thinks.
They’re all morons.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
The talk that there are senior people in other clubs expecting City to be cleared of charges is interesting as non of the main stream media want to run with it as it’s a bad news story. With our departing COO going to Old Trafford to be CEO this must be coming from United. Radcliffe seems to want a better relationship with City than what’s happened in the past. It’s weird they’ve also voted with City rather than Liverpool on distribution of funds to the football league. The rags want something, I’d hazard a guess it’s our ground whilst the swamp is being demolished.
Click to expand...
I hardly think agreeing to the deal package with the EFL has anything to do with siding with City. I’m sure both clubs are not massively arsed. Voting the same as City is not cosying up as a city get no benefit from that deal ???

As for stadium sharing that ain’t happening.

I’m sure Radcliffe will have a cordial relationship with Khaldoon as they know each other from business - but don’t see how the EFL package is a sign we are closer.

They will certainly be hoping we are found guilty - as if we are relegated they won’t have to worry about us for a long time and makes champs league qualification far easier for them.
 
I'm Blue said:
That’s my thinking too.
I think/hope we see protests from our fans if the club decide to play nice and let them use our ground.
I’ve backed our ownership 100% but if they let that happen I would be giving up my season ticket for starters.
We’ve done it before and the thanks we got was them mocking us at every opportunity.
That banner, “noisy neighbours”, “not in my lifetime” and not to mention the thing this thread is about.
They are the driving force behind these charges.
They want us gone, not just out of the league but out of business.
We’ve played nice, we’ve let things slide which from a business standpoint I understand, I don’t like it but I understand it.
If that was to happen it would be unforgivable imo.
Click to expand...
I’d let them have the minihad
 
I think it's unfair asking a fan to talk about the 115 when in reality 99% don't have the legal capabilities to back the club up. We won't win the emotional argument on this subject in any debate. You could hear what Steve was getting at, he just doesn't have that legal edge to make the hammer blow. Fair play to him though for holding is own.

Next time the Overlap is on Steve should bring Stefan with him.

They will all soon realise they are listening to somebody way and above their pay grade in regards to FFP and have very little response, and then you will have Steve to drop the sauce on the other clubs if need be.
 
Bellamy's Caddy said:
That mindset is a product of the reputational damage that the PL and media have inflicted upon City. No logic of 'innocent until proven guilty' has been applied to our situation, to many the official outcome is now irrelevant.

Obviously I sincerely hope we're cleared, but I also hope the response from City is significant in terms of compensation sought for the damage done to the reputation of the club.
Click to expand...

But is there any reputational damage ?

Worldwide City are growing fast City dont seem to have trouble attracting sponsors. Only the other month Kellogg's came on board. All our sponsors are big worldwide companies. The sponsors dont seem worried about the 115 and nor do City

I think people forget that the press/media in the uk are a very very small cog in a huge wheel. City are working the world stage not little old England and its toxic press/media.

Our press/media still think they are big players with lots of clout they arent. They are little sprats in a little rock pool and City are the big fish in the big sea lol.

All this is going on as the pl eats itself, trying to protect the red's tops +1, wanting to screw of the other clubs plus the football pyramid.
Are press/media should be fighting to save our game instead they are in bed with the American clubs.
 
Gorbachev said:
I think it's unfair asking a fan to talk about the 115 when in reality 99% don't have the legal capabilities to back the club up. We won't win the emotional argument on this subject in any debate. You could hear what Steve was getting at, he just doesn't have that legal edge to make the hammer blow. Fair play to him though for holding is own.

Next time the Overlap is on Steve should bring Stefan with him.

They will all soon realise they are listening to somebody way and above their pay grade in regards to FFP and have very little response, and then you will have Steve to drop the sauce on the other clubs if need be.
Click to expand...

Well done to Steve I would have lumped that knobhead rag
 
bluemanchester said:
You are hitting the nail on the head regards public services like water and the utility companies. At the moment there is a campaign started a couple of years ago in Windermere and surrounding lakes about the obscene amount of sewage going into Englands largest lake. Over the last couple of years there has been an explosion of green algae in Lake Windermere making it unsafe to swim in, all fish below the discharge pipes are dead or have nothing to feed on as the amount of untreated sewage kills everything they feed on, making the stream or waterway unable to sustain life. At the moment the regulator is turning a blind eye to this pollution in one of Englands crown jewels. Hopefully this campaign group can turn Windermere into something like Lake Annecy, France which was like Windermere is now 20 years ago, but is now one of the cleanest lakes in Europe. The regulator here is considered, by their lack of involvement and testing, which is their job, to be a major part of the problem and as you say "part of the asylum". I agree wholeheartedly with your comment the PL can't regulate themselves but I am wary that a government appointed regulator will be a fair and honest regulator, as my opinion is the water regulator seems to let the utility companies regulate and test their own sewage discharges. I am afraid that the regulator will let the usual culprits run the show. Sorry if the Windermere reference was a little off topic for this thread;-)
Click to expand...
Its a great example mate. Sadly, its not just Windermere. Every English river is being poisoned while the regulator looks the other way. Even jewels in the crown like the Test and the Wye. Years and years of conservation and protecting our precious wildlife undone by corporate greed and political ineptitude.
 
Craig said:
Didn’t realise it was a cult. Sorry for giving a fuck about people who watched the club through thick and thin but are now being priced out in their thousands.
Click to expand...
that happens in all walks of life i'd love to go to concerts but price counts me out i love to go to cornwall again but price rules me out and yes with two lads football is expensive
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top