PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Gone for a Burton]

The Premier League have absolutely nothing on us. They are piggybacking the Uefa nonsense and are being cajoled by the red top wankers. That masters looks totally clueless, as if that fat fuckin ponce knows absolutely anything about us or football in fact.
He's being pushed into doing this by the red mardarse pricks, remember they was the one's who voted this bellend in wasn't they?

They have absolute control over him, a proper puppet being told what to do by the skint, racist and clueless yanks.

Prem teams furious as Liverpool and United vet league CEO candidates

Liverpool and Manchester United have left their Premier League rivals furious after reportedly having had special access to weigh up the candidates to be new chief executive of the Premier League.

www.dailymail.co.uk

He got the job because nobody else wanted it or to be exact they accepted it but resigned after realising something was amiss.
Then masters gets it because nobody else wants it.

The rest is history.

A least 3 other were offered the role but turned it down.

Another accepted the role but resigned before starting.

Master Bater was only offered the role following a private additional interview with the rags and dippers.

They were allowed by the other 19 clubs to hold a veto on the appointment.

One day soon it would be most interesting to understand the background to all the decisions.

Praps the legislator will demand access !!

 

[Paladin]

I am sure their is such a rule. You probably would need 14 clubs out of the 20 to push it though. It's another thing the gutter press wouldn't print.

There is a rule. It doesn't need a vote to push it through, because it existed when those clubs made their approach to CAS. It is Masters' job to enforce the rules. He conveniently overlooked them on this occasion.

 

[hello]

Same rules must be applied ?
awkward ;)



all rags rushing toward exit from this thread

Is that why they practice the fire drill when we play them?

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

Love that idea - many would contribute

Something like this but with the faces of each of our enemies on each person and the Premier League logo in the middle lol (note AI generated, hence all the weird spellings)

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

Or these

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

I also think that if we do beat all the charges, we do a 115 countdown animation on the big screens like we did mocking the rags banner when we won the first PL title

 

[mrbelfry]

How would a club know what a manager was being paid by other unrelated parties and how can they be punished if they did not know ? And why is it anyone’s business other than perhaps the tax man. Why should the club inform the league and not the manager ? Why should the league know ? In other lines of work your bosses do not need to know or if they do it’s only if it’s a conflict of interest and they don’t need to tell anyone else. It’s only really an issue in regulated financial services and maybe a few other industries

The regs state the manager needs to provide the info that the clubs need to fulfil this requirement. I guess a club could write it into the managers contract then if they breach the rule they can sue the manager for breach of contract or claim ignorance as mitigation. Ultimately I don't know :)

 

[blueyorkie]

Not just idiots unfortunately. Had it last night with someone senior at Deloittes, of all places. "115", "cheats", "dirty money"...etc. Pointed out that he ought to hope we're exonerated as his firm signed off on things - looked taken aback.
My wife quickly moved the ensuing silence along.

Brilliant

 

[remember arthur mann]

Same rules must be applied ?
awkward ;)

all rags rushing toward exit from this thread

 

[Damocles]

The biggest negative for the PL case against Mancini is that his consultancy contract started while he was Inter manager and before City had been taken over, then was amalgamated on our books purely so this type of speculation couldn't occur. They only know about it because we told them we're doing it.

Proving that City used a contract signed before Sheikh Mansour owned City as a renumeration for a management contract for Mancini, in the years before FFP was even a thing, and during the time that City lost £197m is going to take some doing. Good luck to them.