Delegatus non potest delegare.Delegatus non portes delegari or something to that effect.
Delegatus non potest delegare.Delegatus non portes delegari or something to that effect.
No difference between that guy and someone waltzing into your house and stealing the family silverware off the mantle piece.He put a whacking great capital gains tax on them, levied on every trading gain. Legalised theft, if you like. It wounded pensions and pensioners very badly and the stock market too.
A disastrous move, imho.
Correct imho. I think his point is that it looks suspicious for City directors/employees to be involved in negotiations/discussions with any company with which a senior employee has a second contract. I just don't see it. I think the opposite. It would be negligent not to be involved to ensure the club isn't at any fiscal or legal risk from a second contract.
The related party argument is a red herring. If Mancini had taken a part-time job to manage England in the international breaks I would equally expect the leading club to be involved in negotiations/discussions for the same reasons.
I'm a peasant but I remember 'Carpe Diem'.Ah yes and: Volenti non fit injuria.
Fair enough. What about this as a suggested defence to the panel?:
"Oh, just tell the PL to fuck off will you? All they have is a couple of emails chosen to show the club in the worst possible light. We have valid contracts signed by the appropriate people in the appropriate companies and UK legal and tax clearances to support the contracts, the services provided and the amounts involved. And you can tell them not to even think about using the new rules. It was 13 fucking years ago, the cunts. I rest my case."
Could work. And my last post on Mancini ....
Fair enough. What about this as a suggested defence to the panel?:
"Oh, just tell the PL to fuck off will you? All they have is a couple of emails chosen to show the club in the worst possible light. I put it to you…….. We have valid contracts signed by the appropriate people in the appropriate companies and UK legal and tax clearances to support the contracts, the services provided and the amounts involved. And you can tell them not to even think about using the new rules. It was 13 fucking years ago, the cunts. I rest my case."
Could work. And my last post on Mancini ....
I queried Annabel Tiffin when she did this article and this was her reply.You mean the same Annabel Tiffin married to a man kicked out of Greater Manchester Police press office for sexual harassment?
Correct imho. I think his point is that it looks suspicious for City directors/employees to be involved in negotiations/discussions with any company with which a senior employee has a second contract. I just don't see it. I think the opposite. It would be negligent not to be involved to ensure the club isn't at any fiscal or legal risk from a second contract.
The related party argument is a red herring. If Mancini had taken a part-time job to manage England in the international breaks I would equally expect the leading club to be involved in negotiations/discussions for the same reasons.
Edited for you :)