Whenever i get into any sort of debate with one of these clowns I just ask them one question.Sounds like you have entertained the bollocks our rivals talk. Dont engage would be my advice, because they NEED that comfort blanket that we cheated and no amount of correct answers will suffice. Even if we are found totally innocent they will STILL say we cheated. Nothing changes that now.
I usually answer I am not bothered about the charges, nothing proven, but it makes me happy that they are crying about it. They will either stop, or stupidly, keep crying about it.
Thinking about it.. I bet he’s had fuck all sent to him. Acting again, pretending City have warned him. No such thing as bad publicity especially when he feeds off clicksClearly had a letter, that little nervous laugh he did when mentioning legal matters gives it away. Never doubt Tolmie.
Possibly, but his body language gives it away.Thinking about it.. I bet he’s had fuck all sent to him. Acting again, pretending City have warned him. No such thing as bad publicity especially when he feeds off clicks
He’s a modern day Terry Christian, another anti city ****He really hates us which I love knowing , this could push her over the edge City with no case to answer ..
He can still talk about the charges/case I believe. But he cant continue to libel the club, big difference. Time will tell but from that video clip alone, his tone has shifted completely from the previous 12 months of papp he’s been spouting. So lets see over the next week or so if that change in tone sticks….. Or not!!Have to say I remain unconvinced City would have said anything to him - like sending to a mouthy guy in the pub.
However, I do admit the video suggests I may be wrong although after that bit there was a fair bit of discussion about the charges which is a bit of contradiction. The reference to letters could have been after one of the audience made a comment along the lines of Tolmie's tweet. It is one thing writing to a proper newspaper or broadcaster - sending to Goldbridge? So, I still really doubt it.
Goldbridge is probably trying to make himself look like a big player, look at me city have threatened me! When we’ve probably said nothing to him ,but some other journalists like Jordan may have had a flea in his ear and he’s got wind of it and included himself!Have to say I remain unconvinced City would have said anything to him - like sending to a mouthy guy in the pub.
However, I do admit the video suggests I may be wrong although after that bit there was a fair bit of discussion about the charges which is a bit of contradiction. The reference to letters could have been after one of the audience made a comment along the lines of Tolmie's tweet. It is one thing writing to a proper newspaper or broadcaster - sending to Goldbridge? So, I still really doubt it.
Like Projectriver said I’d be surprised if City had bothered with him but that clip and in fact the fuller video certainly looks like something has happened.
he's not that bright!! Looks guilty to me! :-)I feel like it’s more likely gold bridge follows Tolmie on twitter and has convinced himself he’s important enough for them to go after so he better get an apology in first.
Also it doesn't appear any Goldbridge stuff has been deleted which if any specific videos were of concern he would have done. This one from 2 weeks ago is standard fare as far as I can tell. Still up
Agree. Its the future content that will be keyDoesn’t that surely depend on the scope of the LBA? Surely a claimant can choose to limit what defamatory output they seek to control. If he had to remove everything from his back catalogue about City, then the optics would not be great for the club, especially given the backstory. Far better for him to see the error of his ways. And what’s the fucking point of deleting anything these days? It will be out there anyway.
GlDoesn’t that surely depend on the scope of the LBA? Surely a claimant can choose to limit what defamatory output they seek to control. If he had to remove everything from his back catalogue about City, then the optics would not be great for the club, especially given the backstory. Far better for him to see the error of his ways. And what’s the fucking point of deleting anything these days? It will be out there anyway.
That unique Kop humour.
Also it doesn't appear any Goldbridge stuff has been deleted which if any specific videos were of concern he would have done. This one from 2 weeks ago is standard fare as far as I can tell. Still up
Goldbridge is just a click bait bellend.
He is now not arsed with 115 because the new rules they are looking to bring in prevent united from spending the money they need to and limit them to 70/80% of their revenue.
He just wants United to dominate again, otherwise he may as well support Nottingham Forest
Very true, but he'll be shitting his Nottingham Forest arse.Goldbridge doesn't care about utd or City - he cares about making money and he's very good at it by winding people up and getting them to watch, share and talk about him.