PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

N
Response to that nonsense would be, if the owners were to do that, and it was that straightforward to simply bribe someone to end all this over a year on from the charges why wouldn't they have done that before it was it even announced. At the end of the day it's a business and the charges are bad for it
No point engaging with someone who thinks khaldoon is going to “The FA” with a carrier bag of used fifties
 
Was away over the weekend and saw a red i know. Decent enough bloke, good job, seemingly a sensible man

Told him of the rumours that charges have been dropped, told him what the city lawyer told me. His reply …

“Well youve obviously bribed someone”.

I laughed as i thought he was joking but no, he was deadly serious. I asked what he means and he said , “youve bribed the FA”.

The FA? What we have drove to london with a bag of cash to bribe ‘The FA’. Couldnt be arsed going into it as regards what the fuck the FA have to do with all this, nor how he thinks the bribe went down.

He then said “if you get away with it then forest and everton should sue”

Thats what we are up against. Idiots
Trust he is not a mate and just an acquaintance? I've got a couple of mates who are reds , but they are intelligent people, even tho they detest the football club they both think its a bit of a witch hunt against City. Tbh they are much more concerned about the state of their own club.
 
As I’ve posted, Goldbridge doesn’t really need additional money or clicks on Tuesday when and if he reveals the letter?

IMG_1099.jpeg

 
Was away over the weekend and saw a red i know. Decent enough bloke, good job, seemingly a sensible man

Told him of the rumours that charges have been dropped, told him what the city lawyer told me. His reply …

“Well youve obviously bribed someone”.

I laughed as i thought he was joking but no, he was deadly serious. I asked what he means and he said , “youve bribed the FA”.

The FA? What we have drove to london with a bag of cash to bribe ‘The FA’. Couldnt be arsed going into it as regards what the fuck the FA have to do with all this, nor how he thinks the bribe went down.

He then said “if you get away with it then forest and everton should sue”

Thats what we are up against. Idiots
You might want to reevaluate your social circle!
 
As I’ve posted, Goldbridge doesn’t really need additional money or clicks on Tuesday when and if he reveals the letter?

View attachment 117592


Don't forget his other companies, particularly this one.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240506_111546_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20240506_111546_Drive.jpg
    377.3 KB · Views: 170
  • Like
Reactions: jrb
What drives the rag to say this? He only needs one piece of evidence: City are owned by Arabs/Muslims/people with brown skin. I’m afraid this is the motivation for so many, perhaps unconscious in some cases. Xenophobia. Ask him.
He never mentioned anything of the sort. For all his silly opinions on City the man isnt a racist and silly to go down that route.

He , like most rags, just struggles with citys dominance so spouts crap.

But stupid to go down the road of saying what you said
 
As I’ve posted, Goldbridge doesn’t really need additional money or clicks on Tuesday when and if he reveals the letter?

View attachment 117592

Haha, he's made that much money from essentially hoodwinking utd fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrb
Thats what we are up against. Idiots
Exactly, it's the same with the ESPN Craig Burley rant that somebody posted. If Burley can't see the difference between our case and the others, then what the fuck is he doing making a living out of football? He's just another clueless **** who's desperate to see us found guilty so that natural order can be restored and the 'history' clubs can become relevant again.
 
As I’ve posted, Goldbridge doesn’t really need additional money or clicks on Tuesday when and if he reveals the letter?

View attachment 117592

Do you think he got that by turning down opportunities to drive traffic to his site?
 
You might want to reevaluate your social circle!
Ive probs more red mates than blue. As i said, hes a decent bloke, just , like a lot of them , struggles to maintain dignity when it comes to city :)
Trust he is not a mate and just an acquaintance? I've got a couple of mates who are reds , but they are intelligent people, even tho they detest the football club they both think its a bit of a witch hunt against City. Tbh they are much more concerned about the state of their own club.
hes alright, no not a big mate. As away saturday so watched the wolves gamein a pub with 2 lads i know who i bumped into, a blue and a red. The red us exactly how you described, more bothered about united , embarrassed even. Had not one bad word to say against us
 
I’m convinced that City will eventually be cleared, but I also recall being stood outside the Press Box prior to the Friday night 1-1 draw with Coventry in August 1993, and City just about to announce Peter Reid’s successor.

Speculation was rife, but the steward on the door recognised our desperation and reassuringly confided:
“Don’t quote me, but it’s Gerry Francis”

That’s what I think of the ever-expanding list of attention-seekers pretending to be in-the-know.
 
Do you think he got that by turning down opportunities to drive traffic to his site?

Even without City fans going to his podcast site on Tuesday, he will have plenty of views, not only from United fans, but from other fans who hate City, are interested in 115, as well as numerous media outlets, journalists, etc, who like us, will all want to know about the letter and what it looks like. I could miss the podcast on purpose, but the video and letter will be all over the internet, X/Twitter, etc afterwards. Just like this letter, when it was leaked. Remember?

IMG_1100.jpeg
 
I’m convinced that City will eventually be cleared, but I also recall being stood outside the Press Box prior to the Friday night 1-1 draw with Coventry in August 1993, and City just about to announce Peter Reid’s successor.

Speculation was rife, but the steward on the door recognised our desperation and reassuringly confided:
“Don’t quote me, but it’s Gerry Francis”

That’s what I think of the ever-expanding list of attention-seekers pretending to be in-the-know.
In fairness back then city leaked like a fuckin sieve. I knew a programme seller who was privvy to inside info ;)
 
As I’ve posted, Goldbridge doesn’t really need additional money or clicks on Tuesday when and if he reveals the letter?

View attachment 117592

Doesn’t mean the **** doesn’t want to keep the Ponzi Scheme going.

Personally, I think he’s lots of things, but daft isn’t one of them. To make such a specific claim and to not meaningfully follow through with it would invite a level of opprobrium that could be hugely (and possibly fatally) damaging to his brand. Whilst I’m sure he appreciates pretty much all publicity that he receives, good or bad, he will be aware that not all publicity is good publicity especially in relation to a brand that is built of straw - and I expect the fear of losing what he has carefully created and built upon will loom large in his consciousness.

We’ll see tomorrow, I guess.

No shame in being wrong on this, one way or the other btw, and no basis for bragging rights for anyone who calls this right either. It’s simply a (fun) guessing game based mainly on supposition and limited evidence, in relation to a subject that has captivated so many of us for over a year.

Never a dull day supporting this fucking amazing football club!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top