Bluewonder
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 3,447
KPMG audited City in 2005/06, but it's been BDO since.There has been various auditors since the takeover I believe
KPMG audited City in 2005/06, but it's been BDO since.There has been various auditors since the takeover I believe
I’m sure his missus can help release some of that tension…Xmas is going to be tense in their gaff.
The British Darts Organisation has been doing our audits?Deloitte doesn't audit City, BDO does.
ONE HUNDRED AND EEEEEEIGHTY CHARGESThe British Darts Organisation has been doing our audits?
Christ, we might be in trouble after all…..
The British Darts Organisation has been doing our audits?
Christ, we might be in trouble after all…..
But you're OK with SM and Kaldoon being absolute shameless frauds of the greatest scale...and pretty dumb ones at that?At the risk of outing myself as thick as fuck, I struggle with the notion that preposterous charges have been brought by the EPL who must have sought the advice of competent lawyers before they did so. Genuine question to you - do you believe the EPL lawyers are thick as fuck also, or is it the case that the charges were issued by the EPL against legal advice?
For what it’s worth I trust Khaldoon‘s irrefutable evidence statement but as I say it seems virtually unthinkable that any responsible organisation would issue proceedings of such magnitude knowing such proceedings were doomed to fail
What if the charges were designed to just smear City? IE they (Like UEFA) know they will fail but the damage to the brand is the target.
Edit. So yes, against advice would be the implication. And from what I have heard from experts viewpoints - Why have the PL over reached themselves on this case so much
Of course that could all be bullshit if the PL do have something no one knows about.
What if the charges were designed to just smear City? IE they (Like UEFA) know they will fail but the damage to the brand is the target.
Edit. So yes, against advice would be the implication. And from what I have heard from experts viewpoints - Why have the PL over reached themselves on this case so much
Of course that could all be bullshit if the PL do have something no one knows about
Just to smear City is a possibility I suppose but if correct it stinks to high heaven and suggests a total lack of thinking things through by the EPL.What if the charges were designed to just smear City? IE they (Like UEFA) know they will fail but the damage to the brand is the target.
Edit. So yes, against advice would be the implication. And from what I have heard from experts viewpoints - Why have the PL over reached themselves on this case so much
Of course that could all be bullshit if the PL do have something no one knows about.
Of course not. That’s not what I was saying at allBut you're OK with SM and Kaldoon being absolute shameless frauds of the greatest scale...and pretty dumb ones at that?