I wasn't being specific to that one. I meant all of it. Including yours (and the reaction to it). And Tolmie's. And of course all the multiple opposing takes and (often unfounded) claims.
It all creates backdrops that I just don't see how they can be completely ignored. If nothing else, it all creates distractions.
You’re making a big assumption here - the backdrop to this case very much depends on the individual.
I doubt members of the tribunal will be following this issue in the court of public opinion (Twitter and football forums). I’d hazard a guess they don’t have talksport on every day in chambers.
True, they will see some coverage in mainstream press but that is no different to other cases/inquiries they will have been involved in previously.
You could extend this to City’s legal team. I’m sure Pannick wants to win this case, but he would want to win the case equally as much if he was representing the PL.
They are professional people doing their job. That’s all there is to it.