PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

In all my years of dealing with auditors, financial or government, quality or safety the audits would often centre around something that’s come to light. Not only would you imagine all audits for City to answer questions around this you’d imagine every auditor at every sporting organisation would be on the alert.
 
I agree City are called guilty or implied guilty on a daily basis. I do wonder how City will get a fair hearing.
I know people says it's KC and they won't let this effect them but still part of me thinks it will.
Plus I don't see how it's legal for the press/media to call us guilty
The press will carry on regardless. There have been many occasions where they have been in the dock themselves and they will have weighed up the cost of a story like this, you can be sure.
 
If both parties have agreed to conduct the investigation in secret all you are left with is speculation. Everyone likes a mystery and has to fill the vacuum with something. We are lucky we at least have Stefan to provide context. Our rivals just have an endless stream of City must be guilty so hurry up.

The British people hate winners. The clamour to find us guilty is just a way to stop us from winning more. They don’t care if we are wrongly found guilty.

Ironically Americans just like winners no matter what, which is why we are now the most popular PL club there.

115 was the motivation for the treble even more ironically.
Although I agree with the state of the UK towards winners, I refuse to align my moral compass with America regarding winners.
There should be accountability for anyone contravening the rules.
Seems society, in general, admire the successful, not fully realising the abhorrent things they've done to get there.
Anyway, back to the thread....
 
I agree City are called guilty or implied guilty on a daily basis. I do wonder how City will get a fair hearing.
I know people says it's KC and they won't let this effect them but still part of me thinks it will.
Plus I don't see how it's legal for the press/media to call us guilty
Said this a million times, IF city are found guilty of anything there has to be a documented reason available as to why and i dont think because miguel delooney and some nut jobs from twitter think they are will stand up to scrutiny.
 
Although I agree with the state of the UK towards winners, I refuse to align my moral compass with America regarding winners.
There should be accountability for anyone contravening the rules.
Seems society, in general, admire the successful, not fully realising the abhorrent things they've done to get there.
Anyway, back to the thread....
I think the abhorrent things that certain clubs have done 2 get there have been largely and repeatedly swept under the carpet, whereas we are being presented as all things evil to football whereas what we are accused of doing is breaking rules expressly put in place to stop us, i mean investing in ur own business what a horrific thought anyone would think we got teams banned from europe or supported a racist or sent nazi emails or glorified players who assault fans or celebrate ending other players careers
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.