PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Exactly.

To highlight the extent of this smear, I did an intervention yesterday for a nine-year-old kid who hasn't left his bed for ten weeks and not attended school.

I've built up a rapport because he likes football and changed him from a supposed Red to a Blue, now wearing my kids' old City kits.

Managed to get him into school for an hour yesterday and he said what are City going to do when we get 30 points taken from us and why are we guilty?

The poor kid doesn't leave his room, doesn't mix, but he has his phone and the guilty narrative knows no boundaries.
Ah TH, what a fantastic thing to do for someone…….saving them from years of pain supporting the red shite.


Seriously though, that’s pretty amazing, welldone.
 
Imagine accusing someone with 115 charges based on theory of probability, 2+2=5 therefore city is guilty.
That exactly what UEFA did and banned us for 2 years.
Way too litle was said about how weak UEFA case was other then in the CAS verdic.
There realy should have been a condem towards UEFA why they brought on a ban with out any evedence.
It realy was a great day for football when CAS overturned it not bad day like Klopp said.
If UEFA had won it would had been terrible for all the clubs and would have given UEFA the power to punish clubs in the future with out proof if wrong doing only based on theory of probability.
No one in the media talked about the truth it was like "you cant handle the truth"
Everything is in the CAS verdic I have read it 3 times it is very clear.
Instead they said that UEFA lost because City had better lawers when they simple didnt have a proof to what they acused City of.

This is why I belife the conspiracy that this is all from the cartel , from the hakking of the emails, the way Der Spiegel worded the articles, to UEFA banned us for 2 years to these PL charges .
Unless they show me some proof City did what we are aquesed of I will go with innocent until proven guilty.
 
So why do other sports welcome the investment ?
If it's about protectionism than that is no way to run the best league in the world or Europe football
The investment in sports like golf and snooker have been about setting up competitions where all who are prepared to enter benefit.
If the investment in football was to be about huge money as overall sponsorship of competitions I think you would be seeing a different narrative.
In football the approach has been to buy individual clubs which obviously has a negative effect on the other participants ability to be successful,hence where the protectionism kicks in.
 
The investment in sports like golf and snooker have been about setting up competitions where all who are prepared to enter benefit.
If the investment in football was to be about huge money as overall sponsorship of competitions I think you would be seeing a different narrative.
In football the approach has been to buy individual clubs which obviously has a negative effect on the other participants ability to be successful,hence where the protectionism kicks in.

I get what you are saying but I haven't heard anything bad about UAE Team Emirates who now dominated pro cycling. Never heard scruffy Jim moaning that his team can't compete with UAE after a decade of his team being top
 
I get what you are saying but I haven't heard anything bad about UAE Team Emirates who now dominated pro cycling. Never heard scruffy Jim moaning that his team can't compete with UAE after a decade of his team being top
Tbf, scruffy Jim is a genuine competitor. He has clearly said the rags should stop complaining about us and get on with improving.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.