PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The Premier League will only have access to Manchester City's official emails and documents. For example, Simon Pearce used his Executive Affairs Authority (EAA) email address in communications related to the club's financial matters. There is no way the Premier League would be granted access to emails from the UAE Executive Affairs Authority. Rui Pinto, on the other hand, might have had access to such communications.

Pinto's lawyer believed they had presented enough evidence against City. He mentioned that they were shocked when they heard the CAS verdict. I also think that holding onto a hard drive or two serves as a good life insurance.

I have no idea, but it has been confirmed by the French anti-corruption agency that the data has been shared with Germany, Belgium, and other countries.
Also PS where is the evidence he has access to this email ? There is none he target football football clubs football agents.
 
Please explain ?
How do you know Pearce’s reasons for choosing which email account to use?
Why is his choice evidence that he was doing something wrong?
Why would he do something wrong yet expect to be discovered?
You have based an awful lot on his choice of email account, which may just be about convenience.
 
Think the penny might have finally dropped with me about how the committee has to come to a conclusion on a balance of probabilities and yet where criminality is alleged the prosecution evidence has to be more robust than where no criminality is implied. There is a presumption against criminality that has to be overcome by the prosecution. So it is like a penalty shoot out where the defence are given a 1-0 start?
 
Think the penny might have finally dropped with me about how the committee has to come to a conclusion on a balance of probabilities and yet where criminality is alleged the prosecution evidence has to be more robust than where no criminality is implied. There is a presumption against criminality that has to be overcome by the prosecution. So it is like a penalty shoot out where the defence are given a 1-0 start?
..and two keepers at once.
 
First off I would be amazed if he could hack the UAE Executive Affairs.

Second he wouldn’t use his UAE Executive Affairs email unless he was doing something wrong and expecting to be caught.

Pinto thought he had evidence yet it turned out to be nothing at CAS.

Info has been passed to authorities yet nothing has happened so it wasn’t anything.

Finally you’re saying he is holding stuff back as life insurance leaving aside the accusation that he would be got rid of by the sheik.

Carnt have it both ways he has passed everything on to authorities we screwed and he is holding something back

If he is holding it back as insurance then we don’t need to worry do we as he will keep hold of it.

I go back to my point he would have passed it on by now and we would know if it was anything.

To me your post reads either not very incoherent a rag or conspiracy theorist
Maybe all 3
 
I agree. Danny Kelly said what he said because he's a total pillock, not because he's driving a Zionist agenda.
I used to quite like listening to Danny Kelly years ago he seemed to have a refreshing & different view to most of the hacks but sadly he has now taken the easy & comfortable route of slagging off City at every opportunity just to go along with most of the modern clicks driven british Media.
 
It literally is. It's the whole point of football.
It’s not the whole point, though, is it my friend? It might the the main point, or even the overriding one, but it can’t be the only reason we go or watch it. That would be a bit sad, and ultimately mean most people don’t enjoy the experience.
 
The anti-CITY agenda on the radio and wider media is deep-rooted and systemic (yes, I know - statement of the obvious). I had 5-live on in the car and someone was reporting on Leicester's loss to Wolves and that there next games are against Liverpool and CITY - the host quickly (and in a snide way) came back with - well against CITY that is a guaranteed 3 points for Ruud.

I know I may be being over-sensitive - but it is non-stop
 
Last edited:
How do you know Pearce’s reasons for choosing which email account to use?
Why is his choice evidence that he was doing something wrong?
Why would he do something wrong yet expect to be discovered?
You have based an awful lot on his choice of email account, which may just be about convenience.
My point is you would not use a none City email address for city stuff unless you’re doing something wrong and expecting to be caught. It’s bad practice same as politicians and what’s apps etc
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.