PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[gordondaviesmoustache]

See the post above this quoted reply and then go and look in the mirror.

I don’t like looking in the mirror atm as I’m carrying a few extra Christmas pounds…

 

[Saddleworth2]

Yikes. That's ace.

Crikey.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

Of course, it’s positive for the club – new signings, contract renewals, Silverlake, the financial report, Pep, Erling, the board, etc. etc. As I’ve written 115 times, I’m completely convinced that we will be cleared of most of the allegations. But that has nothing to do with what we’re discussing here, namely whether a 'relegation clause' matters if a club is relegated due to fraud.

I’m confused.
You’ve only 50 messages on the forum but you’ve written this 115 times.
Where?
Or were you on here before under a different moniker?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Yikes. That's ace.

Golly. How spiffing.

 

[KS55]

Crikey.

This thread is far out, man.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I don’t like looking in the mirror atm as I’m carrying a few extra Christmas pounds…

Don't leave us hanging (unlike your gut). How many is "a few"?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Article 14

Article 14 reads as follows:

Article 14 - Terminating a contract with just cause
A contract may be terminated by either party without consequences of any kind (either payment of compensation or imposition of sporting sanctions) where there is just cause.

It’s so broadly worded as to be unenforceable and in any event it is indistinguishable from what would be an implied term in the contact. Anyone can terminate any contract if there is just cause. Saying you can terminate a contract where there is ‘just cause’ is akin to saying someone can have a wage increase if they do a ‘good job’. Nebulous, imprecise, lacking certainty and specificity, and thereby both ineffectual and impotent.

Any lawyer worth their salt would kick the absolute shit out of that Article.

 

[The perfect fumble]

I always ask , “what have the saudi’s got to do with it” and hes double confused and just looks puzzled. I think he thinks i havent a clue who owns us :))

He's knows they're Arabs though.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Don't leave us hanging (unlike your gut). How many is "a few"?

I’ve had to move up to my larger suits…

 

[marco]

For those with any doubt- the club would be no where near this if there was any inclination we were in the shit, it's telling you all you need to know without telling you why not 9 years or even 10, enjoy it blues were cleared

 

[BringBackSwales]

A whole different debate as to that sort of transaction should be allowed .

Basically as you are yank owned you can sell yourself what you want, one hotel, another hotel, a women’s football team, anything you want. Bent, racist anti Arab, anti competitive cunts

 

[I'm Blue]

So er....when is the announcement again? February the what?

It should have been January the 15th ; )

 

[Gazza]

A whole different debate as to that sort of transaction should be allowed .

Chelsea would sell the pensioners if they had a decent market value.

 

[hello]

Absolutely no point whatsoever in engaging with a **** like that. It a complete waste of emotional energy.

You might need to take your own advice based on the post above this ;)

 

[Bluesince1979]

He's knows they're Arabs though.

My thoughts too

 

[Asa's left peg]

Chelsea would sell the pensioners if they had a decent market value.

Probably back to themselves!

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

First question Stone asked at today’s presser was about the charges. So predictable.

 

[Mike S]

Jackie called TalkSport this morning. She's generally a good un...

However referring to 115 she said something like "we've probably got away with it" !

All that does is throw fuel on the fire ...

We need to change our own narrative to something more positive like "we will be cleared of any wrongdoing" bla bla bla....

A small but important point imo...

 

[The blue phantom]

First question Stone asked at today’s presser was about the charges. So predictable.

He needs to get the Dan Roan treatment and spend a lengthy time on the sidelines .

 

[CPPSC]

Yonks is not a modern term so I think it dates him to someone aged 50 to 65. It was a common phrase in the 70s when I was growing up.

Yeah it was used yonks ago