PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[KS55]

Yes mate. And we went on a downward spiral almost straight away. That team should never have been relegated.

And he got Burnley relegated that year from div2, iirc.

 

[Winchester]

But only one with such a twattish hair style and punchable face.

What has his appearance got to do with anything?
You sound 10 years old m8

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

What has his appearance got to do with anything?
You sound 10 years old m8

I’ll take that a compliment.

 

[Gazza]

What has his appearance got to do with anything?
You sound 10 years old m8

Should fit in just right here ;-)

 

[halfcenturyup]

I think it would offend destiny to introduce any policy the interferes with the relentless march to 10k

Who the fuck is Des Tiny?

 

[KS55]

This still bothers me 42 years on. Still hate that pervert that run on the pitch. Have the BBC bastards shown it recently?

If we are exonerated , they will show it then.
“As recently as the 80s, City were a tiny club getting relegated at the expense of Luton.”

 

[DTKOAG]

To be precise the thread needs to be culled from last Wednesday and re started.

 

[M18CTID]

And he got Burnley relegated that year from div2, iirc.

It's an urban myth about John Bond getting Burnley relegated. He only took over in the summer of 1983 after they had been relegated to the third division and they finished 12th in 1983/84, his only full season in charge of them

 

[kp220]

The mods should just ban them completely. Not so much for talking shit but for fuelling 100 pages of nonsense.
It’s the one serious thread in here at a critical point and it’s painful plucking out the insightful stuff from putting fucking watercress on bacon (no offence discosteve but I prefer your stadium designs) and the incredibly tedious breadbun debate! ;)

Breadbun? What’s a breadbun?

Ok...I'll bite.... I'm an ex-pat Geordie ... but Been a Blue since the early 70's ... When I moved from Whitley Bay to Altrincham I had no idea what a "Barm" was ... we had always called them Breadbuns !! I soon found out ... it was what you put chips in to make a chip butty :)

 

[halfcenturyup]

I thought the consensus was that a non-cooperation penalty was a possibility, would this be separately pursued do you think @slbsn ?

Barm. See how fucking annoying it is?

And, btw. Yes and no.

 

[Winchester]

If we are exonerated , they will show it then.
“As recently as the 80s, City were a tiny club getting relegated at the expense of Luton.”

I'd just not be bothered tbh
Yeah it was a mess all day, The Kippax at the end where the Luton Fans was a bear garden, under the Tunnel
Anyway it's long since gone .
Unless you are an ex Rag media controller working For the BBC
I'd just ignore them
They have their agenda whatever happens

 

[117 M34]

I thought the consensus was that a non-cooperation penalty was a possibility, would this be separately pursued do you think @slbsn ?

Think stefan hasn't understood there as the point he makes backs up the comment he was replying to

 

[johnny crossan]

Barm. See how fucking annoying it is?

And, btw. Yes and no.

expand please, I'm confused.

 

[Bucko]

 

[Saddleworth2]

Fair enough mate, but...

What if all the things we have won were taken away and given to other clubs like Liverpool, would that not effect you?

And how would I explain to my 7 year old mad City fan grandson that we didn't win it fairly so it's been taken away and we're no longer in the PL.

What if hundreds lost their jobs at City.

The implications are massive I don't see how it would make no difference to you having your beloved club forever tarnished and ridiculed by fans of every other club, forever labelled 'cheats'

If our owners and board have broken the rules in a massive way it will completely devastate me, bringing my beloved club which I have supported for 60 years into disrepute.

We would be cheats and that is as bad as it gets. Most of us love city almost like a family member. Disgrace will be felt very keenly and many wonderful memories tarnished.
Thank god we will be found innocent of the most serious charges.

 

[halfcenturyup]

expand please, I'm confused.

It was always called a barm in Droylsden.

And yes non-cooperation is part of the 115/130 and no, it won't be handled separately. Imho.

 

[eastmanc]

Think stefan hasn't understood there as the point he makes backs up the comment he was replying to

A part of these 115, or possibly all of it, was to tarnish City's name and hobble City in getting new sponsorship deals, whilst down playing our achievements at the same time.

 

[Macca77macca]

Ha ha your brave lad

 

[give it to gordon]

I thought the consensus was that a non-cooperation penalty was a possibility, would this be separately pursued do you think @slbsn ?

This is what puzzles me City are cleared but guilty of not playing along with the red cartel and pl.
When City are cleared surly that proves City were right in not help the kangaroo court. So that should cancel out the non cooperation charge.
If City are guilty than the non cooperation can be used.
I don't see how it can be used as the innocent.

 

[johnny crossan]

It was always called a barm in Droylsden.

And yes non-cooperation is part of the 115/130 and no, it won't be handled separately. Imho.

Think I may have misread his post.