PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[The perfect fumble]

the point being ,the longer the charges are hanging over us there is always a level of uncertainty. Nobody likes uncertainty

Definitely maybe.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

It's an interesting point what can the dippers offer that we couldn't to Wirtz?

Victimhood.

 

[Shaggy]

I still use a green pen, and yes it is just an auditor thing (or it used to be)

C signs everything with a green pen.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

It is a disgrace he handed it over after last season.
The woman that handed it over last season should have done it.

It’s a disgrace he’s still in his job and that the Premier League acts illegally to certain stakeholders on behalf of other stakeholders.

 

[manimanc]

Tbf - he wouldn't have got a great reception

What a shame.
If he's big enough to front a smear campaign and he thinks we're 100% guilty then he should have had the balls to front us up and take the abuse.
The fact he didn't show up tells you everything.

 

[Gray]

C signs everything with a green pen.

I used to cross check my social club accounts to the bank statements using a red pen as it stood out more than other colours.

 

[Agueroooooooooooo]

When Godot turns up, we will learn the verdict.

I'm waiting.

 

[Damanino]

I just heard the panel actually took a long holiday now. be back early August to continue work on this...
no hurry.

:)

 

[mcfcphil]

I'm not sure if I do

I used to be indecisive… but now I’m not so sure

 

[Master-Lotus]

Tbh I thought that the charges would've affected our transfers more than they actually did. And this Summer, if we get Simmons + Gibbs-White + Reijnders instead of Wirtz I'll be more than happy.

 

[Master-Lotus]

I just heard the panel actually took a long holiday now. be back early August to continue work on this...
no hurry.

:)

What? I hope you're kidding! This is supposed to be resolved next month.

 

[chris63]

I used to be indecisive… but now I’m not so sure

I used to go to a school for positive thinkers.
Couldn't make my mind up if it was working so I left.

 

[Truesilverblue]

When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.

 

[hilts]

Any year now

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.

Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[Xhavenjoe]

When Godot turns up, we will learn the verdict.

He must be due back from York soon

 

[danielwood5]

It's an interesting point what can the dippers offer that we couldn't to Wirtz?

Immunity from having to play within the Laws of the Game? Protection from being fouled by opposition cloggers?

 

[TonyM]

Immunity from having to play within the Laws of the Game? Protection from being fouled by opposition cloggers?

I suspect Wirtz may have just seen us play.

 

[blueste41]

When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.

Thank you-ChatGPT!

 

[Plays By Sense Of Smell]

When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.

Or maybe it just takes a long time to write up and cross check responses for each one of over 100 charges....