PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[halfcenturyup]

Sorrow, for me.

Yep. Pink Floyd certainly had it .......

 

[KS55]

Fray Bentos pies would improve if they put some meat in them.

 

[Plays By Sense Of Smell]

With Gill and Parry?

I would imagine with Rankin Roger these days...

 

[Gingers Dad]

What a great ad
"Excellent darling, you're improving".

 

[Plays By Sense Of Smell]

My hope is that we’re waiting for the CWC to be over before an announcement is made

Please let it be a double smug moment...

 

[Plays By Sense Of Smell]

'Pin Ups' is a great album but I always preferred his original work and when he worked closely with other artists such as Lou Reed on 'Transformer'. What was unique about Bowie was he could make someone else's music sound better than the original.

Joe Cocker, anyone?...

 

[Marvin.]

The reason why Man Utd have not breached the Premier League's PSR requirement (£105m loss over 3 years) despite published losses of £330m over 3 years is now apparent (https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6402367/2025/06/05/manchester-united-psr-red-football-limited/).

Utd's PSR accounting is based on their UK subsidiary Red Football Ltd which crucially does not include their takeover costs and full finance costs relating to the Glazer debt pile. Red Football's loss in 2023-24 was £36m, £95m less than their plc based in the Cayman Islands.

I feel that this breaks the spirit of the PSR rules if not the rules because the PSR test should surely reflect the entire costs of running the football club and Man Utd are not doing that. The Premier League and the BBC and the Football media know this. They make no comment on this. I regard this as farcical. I wonder what fans of clubs like Everton, Forest and Manchester City think about this.

Does anyone else find this highly questionable? How can the Premier League accept a set of accounts that do not entirely reflect the football-related activity of Man Utd?

 

[Protein Junkie]

Fray Bentos

Didn’t they beat River Plate in last years Copa Libertadores?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

The reason why Man Utd have not breached the Premier League's PSR requirement (£105m loss over 3 years) despite published losses of £330m over 3 years is now apparent (https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6402367/2025/06/05/manchester-united-psr-red-football-limited/).

Utd's PSR accounting is based on their UK subsidiary Red Football Ltd which crucially does not include their takeover costs and full finance costs relating to the Glazer debt pile. Red Football's loss in 2023-24 was £36m, £95m less than their plc based in the Cayman Islands.

I feel that this breaks the spirit of the PSR rules if not the rules because the PSR test should surely reflect the entire costs of running the football club and Man Utd are not doing that. The Premier League and the BBC and the Football media know this. They make no comment on this. I regard this as farcical. I wonder what fans of clubs like Everton, Forest and Manchester City think about this.

Does anyone else find this highly questionable? How can the Premier League accept a set of accounts that do not entirely reflect the football-related activity of Man Utd?

Highly questionable is egregiously understating it. It’s bent as fuck what those cunts get away with.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

The reason why Man Utd have not breached the Premier League's PSR requirement (£105m loss over 3 years) despite published losses of £330m over 3 years is now apparent (https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6402367/2025/06/05/manchester-united-psr-red-football-limited/).

Utd's PSR accounting is based on their UK subsidiary Red Football Ltd which crucially does not include their takeover costs and full finance costs relating to the Glazer debt pile. Red Football's loss in 2023-24 was £36m, £95m less than their plc based in the Cayman Islands.

I feel that this breaks the spirit of the PSR rules if not the rules because the PSR test should surely reflect the entire costs of running the football club and Man Utd are not doing that. The Premier League and the BBC and the Football media know this. They make no comment on this. I regard this as farcical. I wonder what fans of clubs like Everton, Forest and Manchester City think about this.

Does anyone else find this highly questionable? How can the Premier League accept a set of accounts that do not entirely reflect the football-related activity of Man Utd?

A club that is over a billion in debt and is doing nothing to pay it down, that is sacking its staff and is burning through its operating cash. They are then seemingly allowed to outlay £100 plus in this window on Cunha and the chap from Brentford. It’s dodgy as fuck how they don’t face any sanctions when their chums at the PL have been desperately obsessing over how much Mancini got paid back in 2009.

 

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

Want to see mental illness playing out in real time?
The Magic Twat first asks GroK, the AI feature on Musk’s Nazi app X, to basically agree with him that Citeh are dirty cheats
But when he doesn’t get the answer he wants, he then gets in a lengthy argument. With a bot
Beyond parody

This guy needs some serious help / intervention.
He blocked me months ago when I asked for 1 shred of physical evidence about us being guilty as he was inferring rather than some emails which he believes proves our guilt. Very strange character who I believe is Harris

 

[TheGoat]

that's it then no need to use the best legal minds and knowledge, put it all in Grok!!! He's an idiott

Grok told him three times that the emails are inconclusive.

 

[AirbagsOptionalTheReturn]

Want to see mental illness playing out in real time?
The Magic Twat first asks GroK, the AI feature on Musk’s Nazi app X, to basically agree with him that Citeh are dirty cheats
But when he doesn’t get the answer he wants, he then gets in a lengthy argument. With a bot
Beyond parody

Don't have X, anyway to share some of the Bots "findings"? Just for a laugh

 

[Boris Yeltsin]

Just like religious Johnny's do, you are reading one definition of a multifaceted term to defend an entrenched position.
The problem with Jesus freaks is they cannot negotiate with anything that can't be framed by religion.

Believers in religion go to their places of worship every week, mostly. Some go a ridiculous amount more than that.
As an aethiest, I don't need to go to aethiest classes every week to bolster my opinion. I weighed up the evidence and that was that.
Strange that the god squad must return again and again to preserve their faith. Its almost like the mind knows it's bollocks, but regular reaffirmation doses up the ignorance.
Anyway, that's all I will say on this subject now as a free bentos battle has broken out and I don't want to get in their way.

Talk about arrogant - "Just like religious Johnny's do, you are reading one definition of a multifaceted term to defend an entrenched position."

In addition you speak in absolutes, you put people in boxes, you're sensitive to criticism, you're over dramatic, you want the last word and you have a need for admiration.

You may like to label yourself as atheist but those are all the hallmarks of a religious nut. He was right in what he said. You don't know what you are.

 

[chesterbells]

Yep. Pink Floyd certainly had it .......

Post RW? Nah, that’s not real Floyd.

Anyway, so 9.15 again is it?

 

[SilverFox2]

Highly questionable is egregiously understating it. It’s bent as fuck what those cunts get away with.

They may have bent their own rules but there is no getting away with having lost the full amount of actual money.

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

The reason why Man Utd have not breached the Premier League's PSR requirement (£105m loss over 3 years) despite published losses of £330m over 3 years is now apparent (https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6402367/2025/06/05/manchester-united-psr-red-football-limited/).

Utd's PSR accounting is based on their UK subsidiary Red Football Ltd which crucially does not include their takeover costs and full finance costs relating to the Glazer debt pile. Red Football's loss in 2023-24 was £36m, £95m less than their plc based in the Cayman Islands.

I feel that this breaks the spirit of the PSR rules if not the rules because the PSR test should surely reflect the entire costs of running the football club and Man Utd are not doing that. The Premier League and the BBC and the Football media know this. They make no comment on this. I regard this as farcical. I wonder what fans of clubs like Everton, Forest and Manchester City think about this.

Does anyone else find this highly questionable? How can the Premier League accept a set of accounts that do not entirely reflect the football-related activity of Man Utd?

Why it’s almost as if the whole thing is a crooked farce……..

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

A club that is over a billion in debt and is doing nothing to pay it down, that is sacking its staff and is burning through its operating cash. They are then seemingly allowed to outlay £100 plus in this window on Cunha and the chap from Brentford. It’s dodgy as fuck how they don’t face any sanctions when their chums at the PL have been desperately obsessing over how much Mancini got paid back in 2009.

The PL moves the goal posts for them so they don't break the rules. Ridiculous.

 

[manimanc]

Why it’s almost as if the whole thing is a crooked farce……..

And it's almost like the Premier League have targeted a club to hang out to dry to avert the shitshow and the cover ups at another club.

Hmm it's a tricky one I tell thee.

 

[Damocles]

I weighed up the evidence and that was that.

The fact you think this qualifies you to discount the belief systems of the entire human race, something independently invented by every single culture in the entire world, is just the absolute peak of arrogance.

Spirituality is part of neurology, for the record. Religious feelings are built into the biology of every human being at a fundamental level which is probably why almost every single human being in history, from untouched Amazonian tribes to proto-civilizations in the Indus Valley region, for the 12,000 years of human settlements before around 1900 believed in some sort of spirituality.

And you weighed up the evidence? Can you explain what you believe the energy levels of higher dimensional spacetime are please? What's your thoughts on the strengths and weaknesses of abiogenesis from the conclusions of Miller-Urey? What's the key to the logarithmic sized gaps between the SM and Planck sizes? Doesn't that seem incomplete to you?

Whilst I'm not exactly religion's best friend, don't pretend that your answer for whether a creator exists lies in the realms of evidence and science.