PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Colin Bells Boots]

We all thought that City had just got through before the drawbridge closed but persistent rule changes aimed at us with massive charges on past city rule following have forced legal action.

If Newcastle feel they are being unfairly treated start legal action.

Maybe they feel the rules are about to be removed or eased significantly so are waiting for the city appeal to be released.

Maybe the Board Member that Qatar has on PL asks for no legal action.

Maybe they think they belong with other compliant clubs who have earned historic pass keys

Who knows but I have no intention to feel sorry for Newcastle they are either with the fox or the hounds with their dilemma.

Perhaps they believe that City are on the cusp of breaking the PL and cartel grip?

The amounts of money that the dippers, rags and gooners have spent in this transfer window would appear to be ignoring PSR rules ( or being given a heads up from above).

 

[give it to gordon]

That's not exactly bigging up anyone other than Jack

I was saying it's a shame we never got the best out of Jack because I believe he's better than our other left wing options now and we control games better with him

I want what is best for city and think it's a crying shame that Grealish is not in a city shirt this season when I look at who is in his place

I watched the game Jack did ok but only ok against a team that didnt park the bus so Jack had room to play. Jack wouldn't get that space at City

 

[Crooked_rain]

I watched the game Jack did ok but only ok against a team that didnt park the bus so Jack had room to play. Jack wouldn't get that space at City

Maybe but that's our problem. We let teams park the bus because we move ball up the pitch very slowly with sideways passing like it's rugby. We give teams all the time in the world to get set defensively, so why wouldn't they? - we no longer have the players to make the slow build up play with 60 passes work

Even so, I think we can all agree we controlled possession better with Jack. A big part of our problem is getting hit on the break after losing the ball. Jack is one of the very best in the game at retaining possession.

Anyway we're getting off the thread topic now.

 

[TFC]

I agree. Actually my support of city hinges on the decision.

I like to keep a strong set of morals and if it was our rival clubs found guilty of this, we would be be all over them for years of cheating. We would want them out of the game. I think I'd have to keep that same sense of morality when it's closer to home.

If we are found guilty, I'll be extremely ashamed of the club because we always considered ourselves "good" club. It would be hard to lend my support to an outfit that's breaking laws.

I'm sure I won't stop being a city fan per se, but I think my level of investment in it will no longer be there. Maybe time will be a healer but I'll be heartbroken if we are guilty, especially knowing how we would view other clubs if they were in that position.

I think we'll beat it though or at least come to some settlement where all parties come out of it not looking too bad.

MY support of City hinges on the decision!

Fucking pmsl XD

 

[Chris in London]

What about smoking in the South Stand toilets?

Hides the stench of piss from the sinks

 

[Donmcfc]

They shouldn't be pissing in the sinks.

 

[bluwes]

That's not exactly bigging up anyone other than Jack

I was saying it's a shame we never got the best out of Jack because I believe he's better than our other left wing options now and we control games better with him

I want what is best for city and think it's a crying shame that Grealish is not in a city shirt this season when I look at who is in his place

Funny how you chose to respond to that post but not the other ten calling you out as a rag for your previous post about your support for City relies on the decision

 

[give it to gordon]

They shouldn't be pissing in the sinks.

Sinks are to high for me

 

[Oldham Exile]

I would struggle to disagree more with this. If we were talking about long established rules that existed for a legitimate purpose, your expectations of the club might be reasonable. But we are not. These rules were invented and put in place by a protectionist cartel with the sole intention of stifling the development of City, and anybody else who might challenge the established order. Not content with that, the goalposts have been consistently moved to make compliance for us more difficult, whilst clear transgressions by the cartel have been ignored and interest free loans have been deemed legitimate.
You reference being ashamed if we are guilty. I feel the other way around. I obviously want us to be exonerated, but the shame would have been if we had meekly just accepted the bent status quo, rather than going for it as we did, and winning everything.

I feel you've given his/her post too much respect mate

 

[hoppy]

They shouldn't be pissing in the sinks.

You might not have relished following City in the 70s and 80s, just using the sinks to piss in was considered quite genteel back then...'ooh, look at Little Lord Fauntleroy over there, taking a piss'.

 

[Blue Pete]

They shouldn't be pissing in the sinks.

Why are people pissing in the smoking room?

 

[Damanino]

panel is back to work o 1st of September after a 6-week long holiday. but they spend first week catching up and reading emails, and also dentist appointments, dog grooming, and extension work on their houses will further delay their work on our case.

 

[Kinkybyname]

I agree. Actually my support of city hinges on the decision.

I like to keep a strong set of morals and if it was our rival clubs found guilty of this, we would be be all over them for years of cheating. We would want them out of the game. I think I'd have to keep that same sense of morality when it's closer to home.

If we are found guilty, I'll be extremely ashamed of the club because we always considered ourselves "good" club. It would be hard to lend my support to an outfit that's breaking laws.

I'm sure I won't stop being a city fan per se, but I think my level of investment in it will no longer be there. Maybe time will be a healer but I'll be heartbroken if we are guilty, especially knowing how we would view other clubs if they were in that position.

I think we'll beat it though or at least come to some settlement where all parties come out of it not looking too bad.

Khaldoon will be devastated

 

[jrb]

So, who’s paying the 3 Judges their fees?

No wonder they are taking their time to reach the decisions. ;-)

 

[mexico1970]

 

[dadnlad]

panel is back to work o 1st of September after a 6-week long holiday. but they spend first week catching up and reading emails, and also dentist appointments, dog grooming, and extension work on their houses will further delay their work on our case.

first half term is bomie wood collecting week

 

[Crooked_rain]

Shut up you fucking whelk. Can’t someone ban this bellend?

No need to be rude pal

 

[bumbleblue]

Feels like we’ve entered some Other dimension with this where time never passes. It’s never going to end is it? If this was a criminal investigation it surely would have collapsed or been deemed cruel and unusual punishment- fuck the PL, fuck Masters and fuck the cartel cunts.

 

[Gazza]

No need to be rude pal

Correct, I don't agree with a word you've written but that's no call for abuse.

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

I agree. Actually my support of city hinges on the decision.

I like to keep a strong set of morals and if it was our rival clubs found guilty of this, we would be be all over them for years of cheating. We would want them out of the game. I think I'd have to keep that same sense of morality when it's closer to home.

If we are found guilty, I'll be extremely ashamed of the club because we always considered ourselves "good" club. It would be hard to lend my support to an outfit that's breaking laws.

I'm sure I won't stop being a city fan per se, but I think my level of investment in it will no longer be there. Maybe time will be a healer but I'll be heartbroken if we are guilty, especially knowing how we would view other clubs if they were in that position.

I think we'll beat it though or at least come to some settlement where all parties come out of it not looking too bad.

Joker. This is not just a poor attempt at wummery anymore, it is boring. When are you going to fed up with this nonsense?