Ooof. I literally knee jerk reached for my mobile to put it on my calendar- luckily reality hit a second after I read it.31st of February I’ve heard
They won't be. This is all Chelsea PR - nobody buys it.
Are you predicting a chelsea points deduction?They won't be. This is all Chelsea PR - nobody buys it.
Amended Mr Biker sir
You’ve both made a fundamental error by not adding: “And, it’s live”…Fool that I am! :)
I can't see the FA issuing a points deduction. They would be sacrificing cash (by reducing the fine amount) for a sanction that the PL might impose at a later date anyway. The FA won't be criticised for not giving a points deduction. The PL likely will.Are you predicting a chelsea points deduction?
And they love him :)and Donnie across the pond loves the UAE
It's an odd one. As I understand the rules, the FA have power to order a points deduction, but the PL/the Independent Commission doesn't have the power to strip City of, say, the FA Cup.I don't believe so but no PL club has had a FA deduction so partly untrodden. But as it is clear the FA oversee the PL and points deductions are specifically available to the FA Disciplinary, there is no basis for the PL to refuse to accept them if given. Furthermore, you can see in the reporting that Chelsea accept the possibility of sporting sanction even if they claim it won't happen.
But if what they're claiming we have done in their charges is true, serious fraud must have been committed.Serious fraud would have to involved the company statements being intentionally false and be serious enough for the serious fraud office to be interested Although fraud isn’t include in the limitations I somewhat doubt that, has its so long ago and relatively minor then it wouldn’t even raise an eyebrow at SFO
Explain what you think what serious fraud was committed, enough for the SFO to investigateBut if what they're claiming we have done in their charges is true, serious fraud must have been committed.
I don't think any serious fraud was committed.Explain what you think what serious fraud was committed, enough for the SFO to investigate
That’s not fraud it’s failure to report to the PL certain requirementsI don't think any serious fraud was committed.
But, for the most serious of the charges to be true e.g. failure to provide accurate financial information (i.e.we didn't submit truthful and up-to-date financial accounts about sponsorship deals, including the Etihad deal). That would mean serious fraud would have to have been committed by not only city, but by Etihad, it's owners and possibly even their respective auditors.
That’s correct but I don’t think that’s a contradiction. The PL is a FA governed tournament but moreover Chelsea are a FA governed club. The FA Cup is not a PL tournament.It's an odd one. As I understand the rules, the FA have power to order a points deduction, but the PL/the Independent Commission doesn't have the power to strip City of, say, the FA Cup.
It's 1 minute pass 10am. F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5...I deliver parcels as a part time job.
Today due to the Christmas rush I have 115 to deliver
Its coming.....
You still a fan of his Tolm?And they love him :)
Is that because it’s a Saturday next year?Ooof. I literally knee jerk reached for my mobile to put it on my calendar- luckily reality hit a second after I read it.
Hard to see how it is not a sporting advantage case. And admission and cooperation should only be a 30% discount as opposed to turning points to cash. But we will see how the FA argue it.Are you predicting a chelsea points deduction?
Could be it.Is that because it’s a Saturday next year?
Points deduction, but only if they finish 5th and utd 6th.Hard to see how it is not a sporting advantage case. And admission and cooperation should only be a 30% discount as opposed to turning points to cash. But we will see how the FA argue it.