BeerIsTheBest
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Oct 2018
- Messages
- 1,965
Shaelumstash. Fair response and correct. But like other posters I wonder about the effect when overall journey times and personal costs are taken into account.It will actually shave about 56 minutes off the journey, cutting Manchester to London journey’s in half (nearly).
Don’t get me wrong, I think the billions spent on it could be put to better use, but it would make Manchester to London commutable.
Currently I can get to a mainline station in 10 minutes. And park for about £4.00 for the day. The mainline stations that currently run the London service depend on the high value business traveller to subsidise us oiks in second class and who travel out of peak.
these high value business travellers will disappear onto the new service on HS2 as their companies / business pay their travel. current mainline London busy stations like Wilmslow and Macclesfield have already bleated that they will lose their passengers and their regular London trains.
Travellers to London wanting HS2 will have to travel to the main hub stations. For me as a working example this would add a conservative hour to my travel time to London.
Goodness knows what the cost of a HS2 London ticket will be. God knows how freight will be taken off roads and the existing lines utilised.
I know that something has to be done around capacity but don’t believe this vanity project is the answer.
it smacks to me of a train version of Concord. When that flew the elite could get to New York much faster than the average Joe. Only a wealthy select few could afford to take advantage of the service.
Unlike Concorde, we taxpayers will be funding HS2.